Elizabeth O’Neill

2.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
20 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Elizabeth O’Neill is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth O’Neill has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Plant Science and 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth O’Neill's work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers) and Plant and animal studies (3 papers). Elizabeth O’Neill is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers) and Plant and animal studies (3 papers). Elizabeth O’Neill collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Sweden. Elizabeth O’Neill's co-authors include Gerald M. Rubin, Robert Tjian, Ilaria Rebay, Arie Kaffman, Erin K. O’Shea, Emmitt R. Jolly, Michael C. Ellis, Linda Huang, Tia‐Lynn Ashman and Na Wei and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Cell.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth O’Neill

19 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

The activities of two Ets-related transcription factors r... 1994 2026 2004 2015 1994 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elizabeth O’Neill United States 13 1.3k 374 302 285 163 20 1.7k
Martina Rembold Germany 12 937 0.7× 194 0.5× 350 1.2× 103 0.4× 79 0.5× 13 1.4k
Linda S. Ross United States 19 974 0.8× 523 1.4× 362 1.2× 121 0.4× 127 0.8× 33 1.9k
Hans Georg Frohnhöfer Germany 12 1.2k 0.9× 205 0.5× 329 1.1× 184 0.6× 113 0.7× 15 1.5k
Justin P. Kumar United States 26 1.8k 1.4× 795 2.1× 499 1.7× 126 0.4× 97 0.6× 65 2.3k
J. Omar Yáñez-Cuna Austria 10 1.3k 1.0× 172 0.5× 70 0.2× 404 1.4× 106 0.7× 11 1.7k
Wael Tadros Canada 9 1.2k 1.0× 222 0.6× 160 0.5× 186 0.7× 73 0.4× 10 1.6k
Uwe Irion Germany 20 882 0.7× 159 0.4× 492 1.6× 83 0.3× 89 0.5× 31 1.3k
John Roote United Kingdom 24 1.9k 1.5× 385 1.0× 504 1.7× 628 2.2× 235 1.4× 39 2.6k
Sophie Pantalacci France 16 940 0.7× 397 1.1× 547 1.8× 108 0.4× 83 0.5× 26 1.7k
Asato Kuroiwa Japan 28 1.6k 1.2× 225 0.6× 274 0.9× 778 2.7× 93 0.6× 82 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth O’Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth O’Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth O’Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth O’Neill. The network helps show where Elizabeth O’Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth O’Neill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth O’Neill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth O’Neill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth O’Neill. Elizabeth O’Neill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
O’Neill, Elizabeth, et al.. (2024). Neopolyploidy has variable effects on the diversity and composition of the wild strawberry microbiome. American Journal of Botany. 111(8). e16287–e16287. 5 indexed citations
2.
O’Neill, Elizabeth, et al.. (2023). Polyploidy impacts population growth and competition with diploids: multigenerational experiments reveal key life‐history trade‐offs. New Phytologist. 238(3). 1294–1304. 16 indexed citations
3.
Bandeira, Salomão, et al.. (2023). The sacred and climate change: Local perceptions from KaNyaka island in Mozambique. Climate Risk Management. 42. 100564–100564. 4 indexed citations
5.
Wei, Na, Rainee L. Kaczorowski, Gerardo Arceo‐Gómez, et al.. (2021). Pollinators contribute to the maintenance of flowering plant diversity. Nature. 597(7878). 688–692. 99 indexed citations
6.
Xia, Jing, Na Wei, Rainee L. Kaczorowski, et al.. (2021). Diversity and composition of pollen loads carried by pollinators are primarily driven by insect traits, not floral community characteristics. Oecologia. 196(1). 131–143. 40 indexed citations
7.
Levine, Sydney, Joshua Rottman, Taylor Davis, et al.. (2021). Religious Affiliation and Conceptions of the Moral Domain. Social Cognition. 39(1). 139–165. 12 indexed citations
8.
O’Neill, Elizabeth & Édouard Machery. (2019). The normative sense: what is universal? What varies?. TU/e Research Portal. 38–56. 1 indexed citations
9.
O’Neill, Elizabeth. (2017). Kinds of norms. Philosophy Compass. 12(5). 19 indexed citations
10.
O’Neill, Elizabeth. (2016). Guardians of Chastity and Morality: A Century of Silence in Social Work. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare. 43(2). 1 indexed citations
11.
O’Neill, Elizabeth. (2015). Which Causes of Moral Beliefs Matter?. Philosophy of Science. 82(5). 1070–1080. 5 indexed citations
12.
O’Neill, Elizabeth. (2014). Relativizing innateness: innateness as the insensitivity of the appearance of a trait with respect to specified environmental variation. Biology & Philosophy. 30(2). 211–225. 12 indexed citations
13.
O’Neill, Elizabeth, et al.. (2010). The War, 1914: A History and an Explanation for Boys and Girls. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association.
14.
Kaffman, Arie, et al.. (1998). The receptor Msn5 exports the phosphorylated transcription factor Pho4 out of the nucleus. Nature. 396(6710). 482–486. 279 indexed citations
15.
O’Neill, Elizabeth, Arie Kaffman, Emmitt R. Jolly, & Erin K. O’Shea. (1996). Regulation of PHO4 Nuclear Localization by the PHO80-PHO85 Cyclin-CDK Complex. Science. 271(5246). 209–212. 288 indexed citations
16.
Morimoto, Alyssa, et al.. (1996). Pointed, an ETS domain transcription factor, negatively regulates the EGF receptor pathway in Drosophila oogenesis. Development. 122(12). 3745–3754. 86 indexed citations
17.
O’Neill, Elizabeth, Michael C. Ellis, Gerald M. Rubin, & Robert Tjian. (1995). Functional domain analysis of glass, a zinc-finger-containing transcription factor in Drosophila.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 92(14). 6557–6561. 14 indexed citations
18.
Chang, Henry C., Felix Karim, Elizabeth O’Neill, et al.. (1994). Ras Signal Transduction Pathway in Drosophila Eye Development. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 59(0). 147–153. 17 indexed citations
19.
O’Neill, Elizabeth, Ilaria Rebay, Robert Tjian, & Gerald M. Rubin. (1994). The activities of two Ets-related transcription factors required for drosophila eye development are modulated by the Ras/MAPK pathway. Cell. 78(1). 137–147. 596 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Ellis, Michael C., Elizabeth O’Neill, & Gerald M. Rubin. (1993). Expression of Drosophila glass protein and evidence for negative regulation of its activity in non-neuronal cells by another DNA-binding protein. Development. 119(3). 855–865. 200 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026