Elizabeth N. Schock

540 total citations
18 papers, 361 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth N. Schock is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth N. Schock has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 361 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Molecular Biology, 9 papers in Genetics and 2 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth N. Schock's work include Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (9 papers), Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (8 papers) and Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (6 papers). Elizabeth N. Schock is often cited by papers focused on Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (9 papers), Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (8 papers) and Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (6 papers). Elizabeth N. Schock collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Elizabeth N. Schock's co-authors include Samantha A. Brugmann, Carole LaBonne, Ching‐Fang Chang, Mary E. Delany, Glenda C. Gobé, Brian Harmon, MA Birchall, Rolf W. Stottmann, Joshua R. York and Jaime Struve and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Development and Developmental Biology.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth N. Schock

18 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elizabeth N. Schock United States 12 250 189 36 25 24 18 361
Bozena Polok Switzerland 7 697 2.8× 491 2.6× 148 4.1× 18 0.7× 42 1.8× 10 837
Yali Zhao China 10 197 0.8× 130 0.7× 26 0.7× 12 0.5× 8 0.3× 21 365
Christiane Spaich Germany 8 304 1.2× 269 1.4× 37 1.0× 17 0.7× 25 1.0× 8 432
Arnaud Kress France 9 276 1.1× 202 1.1× 19 0.5× 12 0.5× 18 0.8× 17 437
Meghana Vemulapalli United States 15 360 1.4× 357 1.9× 67 1.9× 31 1.2× 167 7.0× 15 588
Irina Balikova Belgium 12 179 0.7× 243 1.3× 29 0.8× 12 0.5× 61 2.5× 30 392
Prachi Kothiyal United States 7 171 0.7× 211 1.1× 9 0.3× 11 0.4× 51 2.1× 12 373
Francesca Genova Italy 8 289 1.2× 165 0.9× 19 0.5× 26 1.0× 12 0.5× 12 383
Maxence Vieux-Rochas France 11 377 1.5× 141 0.7× 26 0.7× 36 1.4× 11 0.5× 11 475
Brian J. Henson United States 8 471 1.9× 27 0.1× 25 0.7× 41 1.6× 3 0.1× 10 646

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth N. Schock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth N. Schock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth N. Schock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth N. Schock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth N. Schock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth N. Schock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth N. Schock. The network helps show where Elizabeth N. Schock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth N. Schock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth N. Schock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth N. Schock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth N. Schock. Elizabeth N. Schock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Schock, Elizabeth N., et al.. (2024). SoxB1 transcription factors are essential for initiating and maintaining neural plate border gene expression. Development. 151(14). 2 indexed citations
2.
York, Joshua R., et al.. (2024). Shared features of blastula and neural crest stem cells evolved at the base of vertebrates. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 8(9). 1680–1692. 5 indexed citations
3.
Hoffstrom, Benjamin G., et al.. (2023). Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies to Xenopus proteins. Development. 150(4). 5 indexed citations
4.
Schock, Elizabeth N., Joshua R. York, & Carole LaBonne. (2022). The developmental and evolutionary origins of cellular pluripotency in the vertebrate neural crest. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology. 138. 36–44. 14 indexed citations
5.
Schock, Elizabeth N. & Carole LaBonne. (2020). Sorting Sox: Diverse Roles for Sox Transcription Factors During Neural Crest and Craniofacial Development. Frontiers in Physiology. 11. 606889–606889. 40 indexed citations
6.
Schock, Elizabeth N., et al.. (2018). A transition from SoxB1 to SoxE transcription factors is essential for progression from pluripotent blastula cells to neural crest cells. Developmental Biology. 444(2). 50–61. 13 indexed citations
7.
Schock, Elizabeth N., Jaime Struve, Ching‐Fang Chang, et al.. (2017). A tissue-specific role for intraflagellar transport genes during craniofacial development. PLoS ONE. 12(3). e0174206–e0174206. 25 indexed citations
8.
Schock, Elizabeth N., et al.. (2017). Unique spatiotemporal requirements for intraflagellar transport genes during forebrain development. PLoS ONE. 12(3). e0173258–e0173258. 22 indexed citations
9.
Schock, Elizabeth N. & Samantha A. Brugmann. (2017). Neural crest cells utilize primary cilia to regulate ventral forebrain morphogenesis via Hedgehog-dependent regulation of oriented cell division. Developmental Biology. 431(2). 168–178. 8 indexed citations
10.
Schock, Elizabeth N. & Samantha A. Brugmann. (2017). Discovery, Diagnosis, and Etiology of Craniofacial Ciliopathies. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 9(9). a028258–a028258. 32 indexed citations
11.
Chaturvedi, Praneet, et al.. (2016). Understanding Mechanisms of GLI-Mediated Transcription during Craniofacial Development and Disease Using the Ciliopathic Mutant, talpid2. Frontiers in Physiology. 7. 468–468. 5 indexed citations
12.
Schock, Elizabeth N., Ching‐Fang Chang, Ingrid Youngworth, et al.. (2015). Utilizing the chicken as an animal model for human craniofacial ciliopathies. Developmental Biology. 415(2). 326–337. 25 indexed citations
13.
Schock, Elizabeth N., et al.. (2015). Overexpression of CD45RA isoforms in carriers of the C77G mutation leads to hyporeactivity of CD4+CD25highFoxp3+ regulatory T cells. Genes and Immunity. 16(8). 519–527. 5 indexed citations
14.
Schock, Elizabeth N., Ching‐Fang Chang, Jaime Struve, et al.. (2015). Using the avian mutanttalpid2as a disease model for understanding the oral-facial phenotypes of Oral-facial-digital syndrome. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 8(8). 855–66. 20 indexed citations
15.
Chang, Ching‐Fang, et al.. (2015). The Ciliary Baton. Current topics in developmental biology. 97–134. 25 indexed citations
16.
Chang, Ching‐Fang, Elizabeth N. Schock, Elizabeth A. O’Hare, et al.. (2014). The cellular and molecular etiology of the craniofacial defects in the avian ciliopathic mutant talpid2. Development. 141(15). 3003–3012. 41 indexed citations
17.
Schock, Elizabeth N., et al.. (2012). The Effects of Carbaryl on the Development of Zebrafish ( Danio rerio ) Embryos. Zebrafish. 9(4). 169–178. 26 indexed citations
18.
Birchall, MA, Elizabeth N. Schock, Brian Harmon, & Glenda C. Gobé. (1997). Apoptosis, mitosis, PCNA and bcl-2 in normal, leukoplakic and malignant epithelia of the human oral cavity: Prospective, in vivo study. Oral Oncology. 33(6). 419–425. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026