Citations per year, relative to Elizabeth Cecelski Elizabeth Cecelski (= 1×)
peers
Margaret Njirambo Matinga
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Cecelski
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Cecelski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Cecelski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Cecelski more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Cecelski
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Cecelski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Cecelski. The network helps show where Elizabeth Cecelski may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Cecelski
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Cecelski.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Cecelski based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Cecelski. Elizabeth Cecelski is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Clancy, Joy S., et al.. (2019). Gender in the transition to sustainable energy for all: From evidence to inclusive policies. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).23 indexed citations
2.
Dutta, Soma, et al.. (2017). Energy access and gender : getting the right balance. 1–16.6 indexed citations
Cecelski, Elizabeth. (2006). Synthesis Report - From the Millennium Development Goals Towards a Gender-sensitive Energy Policy Research and Practice: Empirical Evidence and Case Studies..8 indexed citations
Dutta, Soma, et al.. (2005). Empirical Evidence for Linkages : Energy, Gender and the MDGs. University of Twente Research Information. 8(2).
7.
Cecelski, Elizabeth. (2005). Energy, Development and Gender: Global Correlations and Causality..20 indexed citations
8.
Cecelski, Elizabeth. (2004). Conceptual Review. Re-thinking gender and energy:Old and new directions..5 indexed citations
9.
Cecelski, Elizabeth. (2003). Enabling equitable access to rural electrification: Current thinking on energy, poverty, and gender. 1–52.35 indexed citations
10.
Cecelski, Elizabeth, et al.. (2003). Major activities and actors in energy, poverty, and gender. 1–122.4 indexed citations
11.
Cecelski, Elizabeth & Joy S. Clancy. (2001). Gender perspectives on Energy for CSD-9 : Draft position paper including recommendations proposed by the ENERGIA Support Group and the CSD NGO Women's Caucus. University of Twente Research Information.2 indexed citations
12.
Cecelski, Elizabeth & Joy S. Clancy. (2000). Gender perspectives on energy for CSD-9. University of Twente Research Information.1 indexed citations
13.
Cecelski, Elizabeth. (1995). From Rio to Beijing. Energy Policy. 23(6). 561–575.42 indexed citations
14.
Cecelski, Elizabeth. (1987). Energy and Rural Women's Work: Crisis Response and Policy Alternatives. International Labour Review. 126(1). 41–64.42 indexed citations
15.
Cecelski, Elizabeth. (1985). The rural energy crisis, women's work and basic needs: perspectives and approaches to action.18 indexed citations
Colglazier, E. William, et al.. (1982). Energy Strategy for Developing Nations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 1(2). 280–280.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.