Eliska Prochazkova

968 total citations
9 papers, 595 citations indexed

About

Eliska Prochazkova is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Eliska Prochazkova has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 595 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Social Psychology, 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Eliska Prochazkova's work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). Eliska Prochazkova is often cited by papers focused on Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). Eliska Prochazkova collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Eliska Prochazkova's co-authors include Mariska E. Kret, Carsten K. W. De Dreu, Michael Giffin, Zanna Clay, Elisabeth H. M. Sterck, E. E. Sjak-Shie, Simon Columbus, Jörg Gross, Luisa Prochazkova and H. Steven Scholte and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Scientific Reports and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Eliska Prochazkova

9 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eliska Prochazkova Netherlands 7 339 246 171 111 63 9 595
Annemie Ploeger Netherlands 12 154 0.5× 317 1.3× 200 1.2× 82 0.7× 99 1.6× 29 646
Paul Reddish Czechia 12 742 2.2× 383 1.6× 229 1.3× 479 4.3× 79 1.3× 18 1.1k
Magdalena Rychlowska United Kingdom 14 666 2.0× 520 2.1× 457 2.7× 313 2.8× 95 1.5× 33 1.1k
Christine Fawcett Sweden 17 363 1.1× 299 1.2× 126 0.7× 136 1.2× 55 0.9× 40 844
Carlos Crivelli United States 13 493 1.5× 477 1.9× 422 2.5× 123 1.1× 64 1.0× 20 916
Marcus Maringer France 5 301 0.9× 331 1.3× 271 1.6× 67 0.6× 47 0.7× 7 539
Daniel L. Bowling Austria 20 323 1.0× 594 2.4× 296 1.7× 63 0.6× 37 0.6× 40 1.1k
David Bimler New Zealand 15 357 1.1× 252 1.0× 286 1.7× 37 0.3× 93 1.5× 69 765
Pierre Poirier Canada 14 60 0.2× 363 1.5× 109 0.6× 60 0.5× 48 0.8× 70 603

Countries citing papers authored by Eliska Prochazkova

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eliska Prochazkova's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eliska Prochazkova with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eliska Prochazkova more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eliska Prochazkova

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eliska Prochazkova. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eliska Prochazkova. The network helps show where Eliska Prochazkova may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eliska Prochazkova

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eliska Prochazkova. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eliska Prochazkova based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eliska Prochazkova. Eliska Prochazkova is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Prochazkova, Eliska, et al.. (2022). Conscious awareness is necessary to assess trust and mimic facial expressions, while pupils impact trust unconsciously. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 377(1863). 20210183–20210183. 2 indexed citations
2.
Nikolić, Milica, et al.. (2022). Can third-party observers detect attraction in others based on subtle nonverbal cues?. Current Psychology. 42(22). 18928–18942. 2 indexed citations
3.
Tan, Jingzhi, et al.. (2021). A comparative framework of inter-individual coordination and pair-bonding. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 39. 98–105. 11 indexed citations
4.
Prochazkova, Eliska, et al.. (2021). Physiological synchrony is associated with attraction in a blind date setting. Nature Human Behaviour. 6(2). 269–278. 42 indexed citations
5.
Moulder, Robert, et al.. (2020). Physiological synchrony is associated with cooperative success in real-life interactions. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 19609–19609. 52 indexed citations
6.
Kret, Mariska E., Eliska Prochazkova, Elisabeth H. M. Sterck, & Zanna Clay. (2020). Emotional expressions in human and non-human great apes. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 115. 378–395. 68 indexed citations
7.
Prochazkova, Eliska, Luisa Prochazkova, Michael Giffin, et al.. (2018). Pupil mimicry promotes trust through the theory-of-mind network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115(31). E7265–E7274. 64 indexed citations
8.
Prochazkova, Eliska & Mariska E. Kret. (2017). Connecting minds and sharing emotions through mimicry: A neurocognitive model of emotional contagion. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 80. 99–114. 269 indexed citations
9.
Dreu, Carsten K. W. De, et al.. (2016). In-group defense, out-group aggression, and coordination failures in intergroup conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113(38). 10524–10529. 85 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026