Elisabeth Jay
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- History top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Religious studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- OliphantK AgarwalM. FridkinH. Gobind KhoranaRichard M. JayJohn WesleyMark KnightJoanne Shattock
- Topics
- American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers)Themes in Literature Analysis (3 papers)Contemporary Literature and Criticism (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Elisabeth Jay
16 papers receiving 85 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Literature and Literary Theory 63
- History 44
- Sociology and Political Science 38
- Political Science and International Relations 23
- Religious studies 14
Countries citing papers authored by Elisabeth Jay
This map shows the geographic impact of Elisabeth Jay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elisabeth Jay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elisabeth Jay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elisabeth Jay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elisabeth Jay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elisabeth Jay. The network helps show where Elisabeth Jay may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elisabeth Jay
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elisabeth Jay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elisabeth Jay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elisabeth Jay. Elisabeth Jay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | North and south (1855) | 0 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | The autobiography of Margaret Oliphant | 8 |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | The autobiography of Margaret Oliphant : the complete text | 9 |
| 17 | The Journal of John Wesley: A Selection | 1 |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | The Religion of the Heart: Anglican Evangelicalism and the Nineteenth-Century Novel | 30 |
| 20 | 17 |
About Elisabeth Jay
Elisabeth Jay is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Museology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 144 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (3 papers) and Contemporary Literature and Criticism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (63 citations), History (44 citations) and Religious studies (14 citations). Elisabeth Jay has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Oliphant, K Agarwal, M. Fridkin, H. Gobind Khorana, Richard M. Jay, John Wesley, Mark Knight, Joanne Shattock and Elizabeth Gaskell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Modern Language Review and Women s History Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.