Eliot Lear

1.2k total citations
17 papers, 57 citations indexed

About

Eliot Lear is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Eliot Lear has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 57 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 6 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Eliot Lear's work include IPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security (5 papers), Mobile Agent-Based Network Management (3 papers) and IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (2 papers). Eliot Lear is often cited by papers focused on IPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security (5 papers), Mobile Agent-Based Network Management (3 papers) and IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (2 papers). Eliot Lear collaborates with scholars based in United States. Eliot Lear's co-authors include Ralph Droms, William Lehr, Brian Weis, Hannes Tschofenig, R. H. Smith, Scott Rose, Robert Barton, Paul Smith, Benjamin F. Hobbs and David Kristofferson and has published in prestigious journals such as Computer applications in the biosciences, Annual Computer Security Applications Conference and SSRN Electronic Journal.

In The Last Decade

Eliot Lear

15 papers receiving 51 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eliot Lear United States 5 34 15 13 11 10 17 57
D. Crocker United Kingdom 5 33 1.0× 18 1.2× 4 0.3× 24 2.2× 26 2.6× 11 70
Michael Richardson Canada 5 28 0.8× 9 0.6× 5 0.4× 10 0.9× 17 1.7× 10 44
Ruihang Huang China 4 25 0.7× 9 0.6× 8 0.6× 23 2.1× 6 0.6× 6 66
Gerhard de Koning Gans Netherlands 6 21 0.6× 8 0.5× 24 1.8× 19 1.7× 19 1.9× 7 42
Arunadevi Thirumalraj India 6 34 1.0× 8 0.5× 4 0.3× 14 1.3× 25 2.5× 10 83
Olivier Fourmaux France 5 72 2.1× 13 0.9× 4 0.3× 9 0.8× 19 1.9× 17 90
Lishoy Francis United Kingdom 5 27 0.8× 10 0.7× 23 1.8× 37 3.4× 11 1.1× 7 52
Anand Rajavat India 5 17 0.5× 11 0.7× 3 0.2× 17 1.5× 20 2.0× 27 62
Michael Clear Ireland 4 15 0.4× 10 0.7× 12 0.9× 7 0.6× 14 1.4× 6 40
Jesús Bernat Vercher Spain 4 25 0.7× 8 0.5× 2 0.2× 10 0.9× 7 0.7× 4 38

Countries citing papers authored by Eliot Lear

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eliot Lear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eliot Lear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eliot Lear more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eliot Lear

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eliot Lear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eliot Lear. The network helps show where Eliot Lear may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eliot Lear

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eliot Lear. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eliot Lear based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eliot Lear. Eliot Lear is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Lear, Eliot, et al.. (2021). Is Visualization Enough? Evaluating the Efficacy of MUD-Visualizer in Enabling Ease of Deployment for Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD). Annual Computer Security Applications Conference. 337–348. 1 indexed citations
2.
Lear, Eliot, et al.. (2019). Bandwidth Profiling Extensions for MUD. 1 indexed citations
3.
Lear, Eliot, et al.. (2018). DETERMINING NOMINAL QUALITY OF SERVICE NEEDS OF A DEVICE. 2 indexed citations
4.
Lear, Eliot, et al.. (2018). AUTOMATIC ACCESS-CONTROL ADMISSION AND MANAGEMENT OF CONTROLLERS FOR THINGS USING MANUFACTURER USAGE DESCRIPTION. 1 indexed citations
5.
Lear, Eliot & Brian Weis. (2016). Slinging MUD: Manufacturer usage descriptions: How the network can protect things. 1–6. 9 indexed citations
6.
Lear, Eliot. (2016). Manufacturer Usage Description Framework. 1 indexed citations
7.
Lear, Eliot & Hannes Tschofenig. (2013). Evolving the Web Public Key Infrastructure. 3 indexed citations
8.
Lehr, William, et al.. (2008). Running on Empty: The Challenge of Managing Internet Addresses. SSRN Electronic Journal. 14 indexed citations
9.
Lear, Eliot. (2007). Reliable Delivery for syslog. 1 indexed citations
10.
Lear, Eliot. (2004). Things MULTI6 Developers should think about.
11.
Lear, Eliot & Ralph Droms. (2003). What's In A Name: Thoughts from the NSRG. 49(3). 265–9. 11 indexed citations
12.
Lear, Eliot. (2001). Requirements for Discovering Middleboxes.
13.
Richardson, Michael, Eliot Lear, & Wei Pan. (2000). Authorized update to MUD URLs. 1 indexed citations
14.
Rose, Scott & Eliot Lear. (1998). Discovering And Accessing Software Bills of Materials. 1 indexed citations
15.
Lear, Eliot, et al.. (1996). Renumbering: Threat or Menace. 91–96. 2 indexed citations
16.
Lear, Eliot, et al.. (1994). MMS WORLDWIDE TANKER SPILL DATABASE: AN OVERVIEW. 4 indexed citations
17.
Smith, R. H., Benjamin F. Hobbs, Eliot Lear, et al.. (1991). A mechanism for maintaining an up-to-date GenBank®database via Usenet. Computer applications in the biosciences. 7(1). 111–112. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026