Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases
20102.6k citationsCheng Chin, Rudolf Grimm et al.Reviews of Modern Physicsprofile →
Ultracold photoassociation spectroscopy: Long-range molecules and atomic scattering
2006629 citationsKevin M. Jones, Eite Tiesinga et al.Reviews of Modern Physicsprofile →
Threshold and resonance phenomena in ultracold ground-state collisions
1993486 citationsEite Tiesinga et al.Physical Review Aprofile →
CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018
2021364 citationsEite Tiesinga, Peter J. Mohr et al.Reviews of Modern Physicsprofile →
CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2018
2021138 citationsEite Tiesinga, Peter J. Mohr et al.profile →
CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2022
202524 citationsPeter J. Mohr, David B. Newell et al.Reviews of Modern Physicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Eite Tiesinga's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eite Tiesinga with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eite Tiesinga more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eite Tiesinga. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eite Tiesinga. The network helps show where Eite Tiesinga may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eite Tiesinga
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eite Tiesinga.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eite Tiesinga based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Eite Tiesinga. Eite Tiesinga is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Newell, David B., Peter J. Mohr, Barry N. Taylor, & Eite Tiesinga. (2018). Data and Analysis for the CODATA 2017 Special Fundamental Constants Adjustment for the Revision of the SI | NIST. Metrologia. 55.1 indexed citations
Tiesinga, Eite, M. Anderlini, & E. Arimondo. (2007). Determination of the Scattering Length of the a3Sigma+ Potential of 87RbCs. Physical Review A. 75(2).1 indexed citations
16.
Jones, Kevin M., Eite Tiesinga, Paul D. Lett, & Paul S. Julienne. (2006). Photoassociation Spectroscopy of Ultracold Atoms and the Study of Physicists' Molecules. Reviews of Modern Physics. 78(2).3 indexed citations
17.
Gao, Bo, Carl J. Williams, Paul S. Julienne, & Eite Tiesinga. (2005). Multichannel quantum-defect theory for slow atomic collisions (7 pages). Physical Review A. 72(4). 42719.2 indexed citations
18.
Tiesinga, Eite, R. Ciuryło, & Paul S. Julienne. (2005). Optical tuning of the scattering length of cold alkaline earth atoms. Bulletin of the American Physical Society.2 indexed citations
19.
Tiesinga, Eite, Carl J. Williams, F. H. Mies, & Paul S. Julienne. (2000). Interacting Atoms under Strong Confinement. Physical Review A. 61.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.