Edwin C.M. van den Brink

421 total citations
30 papers, 185 citations indexed

About

Edwin C.M. van den Brink is a scholar working on Archeology, Paleontology and Anthropology. According to data from OpenAlex, Edwin C.M. van den Brink has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 185 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Archeology, 16 papers in Paleontology and 5 papers in Anthropology. Recurrent topics in Edwin C.M. van den Brink's work include Archaeology and Historical Studies (21 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (16 papers) and Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (14 papers). Edwin C.M. van den Brink is often cited by papers focused on Archaeology and Historical Studies (21 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (16 papers) and Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (14 papers). Edwin C.M. van den Brink collaborates with scholars based in Israel, France and United States. Edwin C.M. van den Brink's co-authors include Thomas E. Levy, Stan Hendrickx, Sariel Shalev, Angela von den Driesch, Yuval Goren, Johanna Regev, Elisabetta Boaretto, K. Schmidt, Valentine Roux and Danny Rosenberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Oriental Society, Journal of Archaeological Science Reports and Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research.

In The Last Decade

Edwin C.M. van den Brink

27 papers receiving 144 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Edwin C.M. van den Brink Israel 9 145 101 27 10 9 30 185
Béatrix Midant-Reynes France 8 133 0.9× 90 0.9× 52 1.9× 15 1.5× 21 2.3× 41 201
Eliezer D. Oren Israel 10 178 1.2× 90 0.9× 28 1.0× 6 0.6× 9 1.0× 18 220
K. A. Wardle United Kingdom 9 165 1.1× 144 1.4× 38 1.4× 7 0.7× 6 0.7× 14 243
Eugène Warmenbol Belgium 9 137 0.9× 146 1.4× 46 1.7× 12 1.2× 12 1.3× 61 231
Gus W. Van Beek United States 8 165 1.1× 69 0.7× 45 1.7× 6 0.6× 10 1.1× 29 235
Zvi Lederman Israel 9 184 1.3× 71 0.7× 12 0.4× 3 0.3× 9 1.0× 24 209
Svend Hansen Germany 8 78 0.5× 98 1.0× 52 1.9× 8 0.8× 15 1.7× 39 145
Rica Annaert Belgium 11 154 1.1× 146 1.4× 52 1.9× 13 1.3× 8 0.9× 41 269
Joe Uziel Israel 9 220 1.5× 112 1.1× 17 0.6× 6 0.6× 6 0.7× 38 249
Kirsi O. Lorentz Cyprus 6 112 0.8× 73 0.7× 32 1.2× 14 1.4× 6 0.7× 27 148

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin C.M. van den Brink

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin C.M. van den Brink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin C.M. van den Brink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin C.M. van den Brink more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin C.M. van den Brink

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin C.M. van den Brink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin C.M. van den Brink. The network helps show where Edwin C.M. van den Brink may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edwin C.M. van den Brink

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edwin C.M. van den Brink. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edwin C.M. van den Brink based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edwin C.M. van den Brink. Edwin C.M. van den Brink is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Brink, Edwin C.M. van den, Alla Yaroshevich, Danny Rosenberg, et al.. (2021). Additional Late Chalcolithic Shafts and Pits East of Namir Road, Tel Aviv. Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society. 51. 136–136. 1 indexed citations
3.
Brink, Edwin C.M. van den, et al.. (2021). Sifting Through: The Characteristics and Significance of Ceramic Strainer-Vessels in the Chalcolithic Period of the Southern Levant. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. 386. 177–207. 1 indexed citations
5.
Brink, Edwin C.M. van den, Omri Lernau, Nili Liphschitz, et al.. (2016). Late Chalcolithic Settlement Remains East of Namir Road, Tel Aviv. Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society. 46. 20–20. 5 indexed citations
6.
Brink, Edwin C.M. van den, et al.. (2013). Naḥal Ẓippori, the Eshkol Reservoir–Somekh Reservoir Pipeline. 1 indexed citations
7.
Roux, Valentine, Edwin C.M. van den Brink, & Sariel Shalev. (2013). Continuity and Discontinuity in the Shephela (Israel) between the Late Chalcolithic and the Early Bronze I: The Modi’in “Deep Deposits” Ceramic assemblages as a case study. Paléorient. 39(1). 63–81. 7 indexed citations
8.
Brink, Edwin C.M. van den, Ram Gophna, Israel Carmi, et al.. (2005). Shoham (North). 5 indexed citations
9.
Brink, Edwin C.M. van den. (2003). Das Chalkolithikum in der südlichen Levante: Die Entwicklung handwerklicher Spezialisierung und ihre Beziehung zu gesellschaftlicher Komplexität. Susanne Kerner.. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. 330. 83–85. 2 indexed citations
10.
Horwitz, Liora Kolska, et al.. (2002). The archaeozoology of the three early Bronze Age sites in Nahal Besor, north western Negev. 107–133. 2 indexed citations
11.
Hendrickx, Stan, et al.. (2002). The relative chronological position of Egyptian Predynastic and Early Dynastic tombs with imported objects from the Near East and the nature of interregional contacts. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 58–80. 14 indexed citations
12.
Brink, Edwin C.M. van den, et al.. (2002). Umm el-Qaab I. Das prädynastische Königsgrab U-j und seine frühen Schriftzeugnisse. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt. 39. 258–258. 13 indexed citations
13.
Brink, Edwin C.M. van den. (2001). The Pottery-Incised Serekh-Signs of Dynasties 0-1. Part II : Fragments and Additional Complete Vessels. Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche). 11(1). 23–100. 2 indexed citations
14.
Brink, Edwin C.M. van den, et al.. (1999). Itinerary and specimen list of M.A. Pocock’s botanical collecting expedition in Zambia and Angola in 1925. Bothalia. 29(1). 169–201. 3 indexed citations
15.
Levy, Thomas E., Yorke M. Rowan, Edwin C.M. van den Brink, et al.. (1997). Egyptian-Canaanite Interaction at Nahal Tillah, Israel (ca. 4500-3000 B. C. E.): An Interim Report on the 1994-1995 Excavations. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. 307. 1–51. 11 indexed citations
16.
Brink, Edwin C.M. van den. (1996). The Incised Serekh-Signs Of Dynasties 0-1: Part 1: Complete Vessels. 5 indexed citations
17.
Brink, Edwin C.M. van den, et al.. (1995). The Nile Delta in Transition: 4th-3rd Millennium B. C.. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 115(2). 303–303. 24 indexed citations
18.
Levy, Thomas E., et al.. (1995). New Light on King Narmer and the Protodynastic Egyptian Presence in Canaan. The Biblical Archaeologist. 58(1). 26–35. 12 indexed citations
19.
Brink, Edwin C.M. van den. (1992). The Nile delta in transition : 4th.-3rd. millennium B.C. : proceedings of the seminar held in Cairo, 21.-24. October 1990, at the Netherlands Institute of Archaeology and Arabic Studies. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 6 indexed citations
20.
Brink, Edwin C.M. van den, et al.. (1989). A Transitional Late Predynastic-Early Dynastic Settlement Site in the Northeastern Nile Delta Egypt. 45. 55–108. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026