Citations per year, relative to Edward W. Merrow Edward W. Merrow (= 1×)
peers
Diletta Colette Invernizzi
Countries citing papers authored by Edward W. Merrow
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward W. Merrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward W. Merrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward W. Merrow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward W. Merrow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward W. Merrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward W. Merrow. The network helps show where Edward W. Merrow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward W. Merrow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward W. Merrow.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward W. Merrow based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Edward W. Merrow. Edward W. Merrow is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Merrow, Edward W.. (2011). Industrial Megaprojects: Concepts, Strategies, and Practices for Success. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).136 indexed citations
Merrow, Edward W., et al.. (1995). Understanding the Outcomes of Mega-Projects: A Quantitative Analysis of Very Large Civilian Projects.79 indexed citations
6.
Merrow, Edward W.. (1988). Estimating startings times for solids-processing plants. 95(15). 89–92.12 indexed citations
7.
Merrow, Edward W., et al.. (1988). Understanding the Outcomes of Mega-Projects.27 indexed citations
8.
Merrow, Edward W., et al.. (1987). An Application of the Pioneer Plants Study Methodology to a First-of-a-Kind MHD Central Station:.2 indexed citations
9.
Merrow, Edward W.. (1986). A quantitative assessment of R&D requirements for solids processing technology.7 indexed citations
10.
Merrow, Edward W.. (1984). Linking R&D to Problems Experienced in Solids Processing.28 indexed citations
11.
Merrow, Edward W.. (1983). Cost Growth in New Process Facilities. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).2 indexed citations
12.
Merrow, Edward W., Kenneth H. Phillips, & Christopher W. Myers. (1981). Understanding cost growth and performance shortfalls in pioneer process plants. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).123 indexed citations
13.
Merrow, Edward W., et al.. (1979). A Review of Cost Estimation in New Technologies.8 indexed citations
14.
Merrow, Edward W.. (1978). Constraints on the Commercialization of Oil Shale.10 indexed citations
Baer, Walter S., Leland L. Johnson, & Edward W. Merrow. (1976). Analysis of Federally Funded Demonstration Projects: Executive Summary.6 indexed citations
17.
Baer, Walter S., Leland L. Johnson, & Edward W. Merrow. (1976). Analysis of Federally Funded Demonstration Projects.9 indexed citations
18.
Baer, Walter S., et al.. (1976). Analysis of Federally Funded Demonstration Projects: Supporting Case Studies.6 indexed citations
19.
Johnson, Leland L., Edward W. Merrow, Walter S. Baer, & Arthur Alexander. (1976). Alternative Institutional Arrangements for Developing and Commercializing Breeder Reactor Technology..3 indexed citations
20.
Baer, Walter S., et al.. (1976). Analysis of Federally Funded Demonstration Projects: Final Report.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.