Edward Stepanski

3.6k citations
48 papers · 2.4k indexed · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Edward Stepanski

42 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Edward Stepanski
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.4k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 575
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.0k
  • Family Practice 43
  • Physiology 417
Replace Megan Crawford with:
Megan Crawford United States
Kathy P. Parker United States
Monica Martoni Italy
Ferdinand Zizi United States
Martha Lentz United States
Yong Won Cho South Korea
Sébastien Simard Canada
Shirin Mollayeva Canada
Luca Vignatelli Italy
Zoran Đogaš Croatia
Edward Stepanski relative to Megan Crawford United States Megan Crawford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Megan Crawford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward Stepanski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Stepanski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Stepanski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Stepanski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Stepanski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Stepanski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Stepanski. The network helps show where Edward Stepanski may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edward Stepanski, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward Stepanski Line = papers co-authored together Edward Stepanski links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20240
3 20226
4 202129
5 202111
6 20190
7 20096
8 200912
9 2007154
10 200656
11 200653
12
Hypnotics should not be considered for the initial treatment of chronic insomnia. Con.
200515
13 2003484
14 200312
15 2000135
16 199731
17 1994104
18
Psychometric profiles of patient populations with excessive daytime sleepiness.
19902
19 199014
20 19885

About Edward Stepanski

Edward Stepanski is a scholar working on Family Practice, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Applied Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (21 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (20 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (6 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (5 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (5 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (5 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (4 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.4k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (575 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Family Practice (43 citations) and Physiology (417 citations). Edward Stepanski has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James K. Wyatt, Thomas Roth, Frank Zorick, Michael L. Perlis, Ali Keshavarzian, Ziba Ranjbaran, Laurie Keefer, James Lamphere, Pietro Badia and H. Heith Durrence. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, SLEEP, JAMA Network Open and Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026