Edward S. Lim

436 total citations
9 papers, 326 citations indexed

About

Edward S. Lim is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Edward S. Lim has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 326 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Ophthalmology, 4 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Edward S. Lim's work include Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers). Edward S. Lim is often cited by papers focused on Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers). Edward S. Lim collaborates with scholars based in United States. Edward S. Lim's co-authors include David J. Apple, Ehud I. Assia, Alan N. Carlson, Sandra Brown, Todd D. Gwin, Daniel Wasserman, David J. Apple, Peggy E. Swanson, John G. Gallo and Steven W. Newell and has published in prestigious journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Edward S. Lim

8 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Edward S. Lim United States	7	302	220	42	26	17	9	326
Prut Hanutsaha Thailand	9	265 0.9×	234 1.1×	24 0.6×	6 0.2×	16 0.9×	16	323
Gunnar Jakobsson Sweden	11	411 1.4×	288 1.3×	79 1.9×	19 0.7×	13 0.8×	16	433
Frank Wilhelm Germany	7	121 0.4×	180 0.8×	22 0.5×	33 1.3×	29 1.7×	30	258
Dawn Hay Canada	9	294 1.0×	163 0.7×	65 1.5×	6 0.2×	14 0.8×	12	323
Miguel Busquets United States	7	277 0.9×	178 0.8×	19 0.5×	23 0.9×	19 1.1×	19	327
PadmajaKumari Rani India	7	215 0.7×	154 0.7×	55 1.3×	8 0.3×	10 0.6×	8	257
Edgar L. Ready United States	5	419 1.4×	249 1.1×	64 1.5×	25 1.0×	35 2.1×	8	440
Karin Schmetterer Austria	6	383 1.3×	289 1.3×	119 2.8×	17 0.7×	7 0.4×	6	392
Frank Goes Netherlands	7	178 0.6×	135 0.6×	104 2.5×	12 0.5×	13 0.8×	24	210
Hania C. Laganowski United Kingdom	5	226 0.7×	169 0.8×	18 0.4×	12 0.5×	21 1.2×	7	269

Countries citing papers authored by Edward S. Lim

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward S. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward S. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward S. Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward S. Lim

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward S. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward S. Lim. The network helps show where Edward S. Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward S. Lim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward S. Lim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward S. Lim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward S. Lim. Edward S. Lim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Lim, Edward S., John G. Gallo, & Peggy E. Swanson. (1998). The relationship between international bond markets and international stock markets. International Review of Financial Analysis. 7(2). 181–190. 12 indexed citations

2.

Chaudhry, Nauman, Edward S. Lim, Yoshihiro Saito, William F. Mieler, & Peter E. Liggett. (1995). Early Vitrectomy and Endolaser Photocoagulation in Patients with Type I ]Diabetes with Severe Vitreous Hemorrhage. Ophthalmology. 102(8). 1164–1169. 16 indexed citations

3.

Lim, Edward S., et al.. (1995). A quantitative and qualitative assessment of the Solitaire Bifocal Contact Lens.. PubMed. 21(1). 20–3. 1 indexed citations

4.

Newell, Steven W., et al.. (1994). Hallermann-Streiff Syndrome With Coats Disease. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 31(2). 123–125. 13 indexed citations

5.

Assia, Ehud I., et al.. (1992). Removal of viscoelastic materials after experimental cataract surgery in vitro. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 18(1). 3–6. 88 indexed citations

6.

Lim, Edward S., et al.. (1991). An Analysis of Flexible Anterior Chamber Lenses with Special Reference to the Normalized Rate of Lens Explantation. Ophthalmology. 98(2). 243–246. 39 indexed citations

7.

Assia, Ehud I., et al.. (1991). The Elastic Properties of the Lens Capsule in Capsulorhexis. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 111(5). 628–632. 62 indexed citations

8.

Apple, David J., et al.. (1991). The Elastic Properties of the Lens Capsule in Capsulorhexis: Reply. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 112(3). 355–355.

9.

Apple, David J., et al.. (1990). Preparation and Study of Human Eyes Obtained Postmortem with the Miyake Posterior Photographic Technique. Ophthalmology. 97(6). 810–816. 95 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact