544 total citations 11 papers, 84 citations indexed
About
Edward S. Forster is a scholar working on Philosophy, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Archeology.
According to data from OpenAlex, Edward S. Forster has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 84 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Philosophy, 1 paper in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 1 paper in Archeology. Recurrent topics in Edward S. Forster's work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (1 paper). Edward S. Forster is often cited by papers focused on Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (1 paper). Edward S. Forster collaborates with scholars based in . Edward S. Forster's co-authors include Aristotle , David J. Furley, John Ε. Rexine, Douglas Dakin, Francis Sparshott and A. L. Peck and has published in prestigious journals such as Phoenix, Greece and Rome and Harvard University Press eBooks.
Citations per year, relative to Edward S. Forster Edward S. Forster (= 1×)
peers
Fritz Saxl
Countries citing papers authored by Edward S. Forster
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward S. Forster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward S. Forster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward S. Forster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward S. Forster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward S. Forster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward S. Forster. The network helps show where Edward S. Forster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward S. Forster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward S. Forster.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward S. Forster based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Edward S. Forster. Edward S. Forster is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
11 of 11 papers shown
1.
, Aristotle, et al.. (2011). Posterior Analytics/Topica. Medical Entomology and Zoology.17 indexed citations
2.
Forster, Edward S., et al.. (1984). Epitome of Roman history. Harvard University Press eBooks.18 indexed citations
3.
Forster, Edward S., et al.. (1968). On agriculture and Trees.2 indexed citations
4.
Forster, Edward S., et al.. (1968). On Agriculture And Trees: In Three Volumes : Iii, Res Tustica X-Xii, De Arboribus.2 indexed citations
5.
Forster, Edward S., et al.. (1968). On agriculture and trees = Res rustica de Arboribus : in three volumes. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
6.
Forster, Edward S., et al.. (1960). On agriculture: in three volumes : II. Res Rustica V-IX.1 indexed citations
Sparshott, Francis, Edward S. Forster, & David J. Furley. (1956). Aristotle: On Sophistical Refutations. Phoenix. 10(4). 184–184.5 indexed citations
9.
, Aristotle, Edward S. Forster, & David J. Furley. (1955). On Sophistical Refutations. On Coming-to-be and Passing Away. On the Cosmos. Medical Entomology and Zoology.22 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.