Edward Pope

985 citations
43 papers · 632 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Edward Pope

39 papers receiving 618 citations

Peers

Edward Pope
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Global and Planetary Change 278
  • Soil Science 83
  • Atmospheric Science 126
  • Water Science and Technology 92
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 125
Replace Philip Omondi with:
Philip Omondi Kenya
Teferi Demissie Norway
Hirofumi Sakuma Japan
Helena Gerdener Germany
Patricia Trambauer Netherlands
José Silva Brazil
Elias Massoud United States
Beatriz M. Funatsu France
Mary Kilavi United Kingdom
Gang Yin China
Edward Pope relative to Philip Omondi Kenya Philip Omondi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Philip Omondi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward Pope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Pope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Pope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Pope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Pope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Pope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Pope. The network helps show where Edward Pope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edward Pope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward Pope Line = papers co-authored together Edward Pope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201759
2 201859
3 201558
4 201755
5 202042
6 202136
7 202224
8 202023
9 200521
10 201920
11 202219
12 200618
13 201717
14 202116
15 202015
16 202114
17
Environmental tipping points and food system dynamics: Main report
201711
18 202211
19 201710
20 20209

About Edward Pope

Edward Pope is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science and Soil Science, having authored 43 papers that have together received 632 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate change impacts on agriculture (14 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (9 papers), Climate variability and models (9 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (6 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (6 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (5 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (3 papers) and Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (278 citations), Soil Science (83 citations), Atmospheric Science (126 citations), Water Science and Technology (92 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (125 citations). Edward Pope has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Adam A. Scaife, Chris Kent, Jemma Davie, Cathryn E. Birch, Nick Dunstone, Sarah Chapman, Erika J. Palin, John H. Marsham, Hans Fangohr and Catherine P. Bradshaw. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Environmental Research Letters, Climate Services, Environmental Research Communications and Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact