Edward J. Gerber

1.1k total citations
12 papers, 768 citations indexed

About

Edward J. Gerber is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Edward J. Gerber has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 768 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Surgery, 9 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 5 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Edward J. Gerber's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (9 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (5 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers). Edward J. Gerber is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (9 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (5 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers). Edward J. Gerber collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Edward J. Gerber's co-authors include W. B. Rodgers, Jamie Patterson and William Blake Rodgers and has published in prestigious journals such as Spine, The American Journal of Surgery and European Spine Journal.

In The Last Decade

Edward J. Gerber

10 papers receiving 715 citations

Peers

Edward J. Gerber

PFM

SURGE

PHARM

BE

EPIDE

William Blake Rodgers United States

Antoine Tohmeh United States

Etevaldo Coutinho Brazil

Clément Silvestre France

Timo Niinimäki Finland

Leonardo Oliveira United States

Rhiannon M. Parker Australia

Armen R. Deukmedjian United States

Alexis Shelokov United States

Carl M. Blecher Australia

William Blake Rodgers United States

Edward J. Gerber

1.0k ×1.4

PFM

1.0k ×1.5

SURGE

320 ×0.9

PHARM

100 ×0.9

BE

9 ×0.8

EPIDE

Citations per year, relative to Edward J. Gerber Edward J. Gerber (= 1×) peers William Blake Rodgers

Countries citing papers authored by Edward J. Gerber

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward J. Gerber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward J. Gerber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward J. Gerber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward J. Gerber

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward J. Gerber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward J. Gerber. The network helps show where Edward J. Gerber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward J. Gerber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward J. Gerber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward J. Gerber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward J. Gerber. Edward J. Gerber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Gerber, Edward J., et al.. (2015). MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics. European Spine Journal. 24(S3). 287–313. 81 indexed citations

2.

Gerber, Edward J., et al.. (2013). Clinical and Radiographic Outcome in Less Invasive Lumbar Fusion: XLIF at Two Year Follow-Up. 2(3). 10 indexed citations

3.

Rodgers, W. B., et al.. (2012). Clinical and radiographic outcomes of extreme lateral approach to interbody fusion with β-tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite composite for lumbar degenerative conditions. The International Journal of Spine Surgery. 6(1). 24–28. 16 indexed citations

4.

Rodgers, William Blake, et al.. (2012). Grade 2 Spondylolisthesis at L4-5 Treated by XLIF: Safety and Midterm Results in the “Worst Case Scenario”. The Scientific World JOURNAL. 2012. 1–7. 32 indexed citations

5.

Rodgers, William Blake, et al.. (2010). Lumbar Fusion in Octogenarians. Spine. 35(Supplement). S355–S360. 95 indexed citations

6.

Rodgers, W. B., Edward J. Gerber, & Jamie Patterson. (2010). Intraoperative and Early Postoperative Complications in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion. Spine. 36(1). 26–32. 344 indexed citations

7.

Rodgers, William Blake, et al.. (2010). Early Complications of Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Obese. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques. 23(6). 393–397. 119 indexed citations

8.

Rodgers, W. B., Edward J. Gerber, & Jamie Patterson. (2010). Fusion after minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Analysis of extreme lateral interbody fusion by computed tomography. PubMed. 4(2). 63–66. 66 indexed citations

9.

Rodgers, W. B. & Edward J. Gerber. (2010). Outcomes of MIS Spinal Fusion: 12 and 24 Months. The Spine Journal. 10(9). S141–S141. 1 indexed citations

10.

Rodgers, W. B. & Edward J. Gerber. (2010). A DBM, BMA, Local Bone Graft Composite in Multi-Level PLIF: Fusion Rates. The Spine Journal. 10(9). S26–S26. 1 indexed citations

11.

Gerber, Edward J., et al.. (2008). P22. Safety of the Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF) Procedure: Complication Rates in a Series of 300 Surgeries. The Spine Journal. 8(5). 112S–112S. 2 indexed citations

12.

Gerber, Edward J., et al.. (1960). Operative cholangiography through a foley catheter during exploration of the common duct. The American Journal of Surgery. 99(3). 332–333. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact