Edward D. Gilmore
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- R. ZacestJan Koch‐WeserJohn V. WeilCharles A. ChidseyChris HudsonDavid PreissWai‐Ching LamRobert G. Devenyi
- Topics
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis (8 papers)Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers)Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologyInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Edward D. Gilmore
12 papers receiving 491 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 227
- Ophthalmology 163
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 153
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 77
- Molecular Biology 74
Countries citing papers authored by Edward D. Gilmore
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward D. Gilmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward D. Gilmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward D. Gilmore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward D. Gilmore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward D. Gilmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward D. Gilmore. The network helps show where Edward D. Gilmore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward D. Gilmore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward D. Gilmore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward D. Gilmore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward D. Gilmore. Edward D. Gilmore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clinical measurement of ocular blood flow | 4 |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 41 | |
| 6 | 47 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Inter– and Intra–Operator Variability in Canon Laser Blood Flowmeter Measurements of Retinal Arteriolar Diameter, Blood Velocity and Flow | 2 |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 216 | |
| 12 | 180 |
About Edward D. Gilmore
Edward D. Gilmore is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 577 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Imaging and Analysis (8 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (163 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (227 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (153 citations). Edward D. Gilmore has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. Zacest, Jan Koch‐Weser, John V. Weil, Charles A. Chidsey, Chris Hudson, David Preiss, Wai‐Ching Lam, Robert G. Devenyi, Mark S. Mandelcorn and Patricia T. Harvey. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.