Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Edna Granéli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edna Granéli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edna Granéli more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edna Granéli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edna Granéli. The network helps show where Edna Granéli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edna Granéli
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edna Granéli.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edna Granéli based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Edna Granéli. Edna Granéli is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Salomon, Paulo S., et al.. (2006). First report of Amoebophrya sp parasites infecting dinoflagellates from Brazilian coastal waters. Journal of Coastal Research. 1090–1093.4 indexed citations
Granéli, Edna, Per Carlsson, & Cathérine Legrand. (1999). The role of C, N and P in dissolved and particulate organic matter as a nutrient source for phytoplankton growth, including toxic species. Aquatic Microbial Ecology. 33. 17–27.7 indexed citations
11.
Maestrini, S. Y., B. R. Berland, Per Carlsson, Edna Granéli, & Annie Pastoureaud. (1996). Recent advances in the biology and ecology of the toxic dinoflagellate genus Dinophysis : the enigma continues. 397–400.3 indexed citations
12.
Granéli, Edna, et al.. (1995). Was the Chrysochromulina polylepis bloom in 1988 caused by a release of cobalt or vitamin B12 from a previous bloom of Skeletonema costatum. 223–229.5 indexed citations
13.
Granéli, Edna & Conny Haraldsson. (1993). Can Increased Leaching of Trace Metals from Acidified Areas Influence Phyto- plankton Growth in Coastal Waters?. AMBIO. 22. 308–311.25 indexed citations
14.
Granéli, Edna, E. Paasche, & Serge Y. Maestrini. (1993). Three years after the Chrysochromulina polylepis bloom in Scandinavian waters in 1988 : some conclusions of recent research and monitoring. 23–32.23 indexed citations
15.
Granéli, Edna. (1990). Toxic marine phytoplankton : proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Toxic Marine Phytoplankton, held June 26-30, 1989, in Lund, Sweden. Elsevier eBooks.4 indexed citations
16.
Granéli, Edna, Kerstin Wallström, Ulf Larsson, Wilhelm Granéli, & Ragnar Elmgren. (1990). Nutrient limitation of primary production in the Baltic Sea area. AMBIO. 19(3). 142–151.314 indexed citations
Granéli, Edna. (1984). Algal growth potential and limiting nutrients for phytoplankton production in Öresund water of Baltic and Kattegat origin. Limnologica. 15(2). 563–569.12 indexed citations
Granéli, Edna. (1979). Algal assay of limiting nutrients for phytoplankton production in the Öresund. 34. 117–128.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.