Edmund G. Seebauer

4.1k total citations
238 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

Edmund G. Seebauer is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Edmund G. Seebauer has authored 238 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 142 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 98 papers in Materials Chemistry and 60 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Edmund G. Seebauer's work include Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (72 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (72 papers) and Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (53 papers). Edmund G. Seebauer is often cited by papers focused on Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (72 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (72 papers) and Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (53 papers). Edmund G. Seebauer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Germany. Edmund G. Seebauer's co-authors include Hicham Idriss, L.D. Schmidt, Richard I. Masel, Jason Ganley, A.C.F. Kong, Richard D. Braatz, Prashun Gorai, R. Ditchfield, Rudiyanto Gunawan and Kapil Dev and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Physical Review Letters and The Journal of Chemical Physics.

In The Last Decade

Edmund G. Seebauer

220 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Edmund G. Seebauer United States 31 1.9k 1.5k 827 448 417 238 3.3k
Tamio Ikeshoji Japan 38 2.1k 1.1× 1.7k 1.1× 992 1.2× 731 1.6× 367 0.9× 145 4.6k
J. Cotrino Spain 32 1.5k 0.8× 1.4k 1.0× 374 0.5× 378 0.8× 483 1.2× 112 3.2k
Sebastian Günther Germany 37 3.3k 1.7× 1.5k 1.0× 1.9k 2.3× 693 1.5× 494 1.2× 134 4.7k
Eric Ganz United States 42 2.8k 1.5× 1.1k 0.7× 1.8k 2.2× 856 1.9× 470 1.1× 91 5.3k
Hiroshi Nakanishi Japan 28 2.1k 1.1× 1.1k 0.8× 1.2k 1.5× 613 1.4× 509 1.2× 302 3.6k
Isao Kojima Japan 27 1.6k 0.8× 1.0k 0.7× 406 0.5× 198 0.4× 263 0.6× 203 3.2k
Daniel Sheppard United States 15 2.0k 1.1× 1.0k 0.7× 511 0.6× 432 1.0× 557 1.3× 25 3.2k
Da‐Jiang Liu United States 27 1.3k 0.7× 550 0.4× 986 1.2× 285 0.6× 326 0.8× 114 2.3k
Jens Jørgen Mortensen Denmark 25 3.8k 2.0× 1.5k 1.0× 1.6k 2.0× 787 1.8× 799 1.9× 41 5.3k
M. Liehr United States 32 1.5k 0.8× 2.1k 1.4× 1.1k 1.3× 151 0.3× 138 0.3× 115 3.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Edmund G. Seebauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edmund G. Seebauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edmund G. Seebauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edmund G. Seebauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edmund G. Seebauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edmund G. Seebauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edmund G. Seebauer. The network helps show where Edmund G. Seebauer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edmund G. Seebauer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edmund G. Seebauer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edmund G. Seebauer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edmund G. Seebauer. Edmund G. Seebauer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Seebauer, Edmund G., et al.. (2023). Effects of adventitious impurity adsorption on oxygen interstitial injection rates from submerged TiO2(110) and ZnO(0001) surfaces. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films. 41(3). 2 indexed citations
3.
Seebauer, Edmund G., et al.. (2022). Strong Isotopic Fractionation of Oxygen in TiO2 Obtained by Surface-Enhanced Solid-State Diffusion. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 13(42). 9841–9847. 4 indexed citations
4.
Seebauer, Edmund G., et al.. (2022). Effects of Ultraviolet Illumination on Oxygen Interstitial Injection from TiO2 under Liquid Water. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 126(49). 20800–20806. 3 indexed citations
5.
Ertekin, Elif, et al.. (2022). Surface-Based Post-synthesis Manipulation of Point Defects in Metal Oxides Using Liquid Water. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 14(29). 34059–34068. 5 indexed citations
6.
Li, Ming, et al.. (2021). Mechanism of creation and destruction of oxygen interstitial atoms by nonpolar zinc oxide(1010) surfaces. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 23(30). 16423–16435. 5 indexed citations
7.
Seebauer, Edmund G., et al.. (2020). Fermi level dependence of gas–solid oxygen defect exchange mechanism on TiO2 (110) by first-principles calculations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 153(12). 124710–124710. 5 indexed citations
8.
Ertekin, Elif, et al.. (2020). Kinetic Control of Oxygen Interstitial Interaction with TiO2(110) via the Surface Fermi Energy. Langmuir. 36(42). 12632–12648. 9 indexed citations
9.
Seebauer, Edmund G., et al.. (2018). First-principles description of oxygen self-diffusion in rutile TiO2: assessment of uncertainties due to enthalpy and entropy contributions. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 20(25). 17448–17457. 13 indexed citations
10.
Henderson, Jerrod A., et al.. (2015). Chemical engineering design projects across the curriculum at a large research-intensive public university. International journal of engineering education. 31(5). 1352–1375. 3 indexed citations
11.
Henderson, Jerrod A., et al.. (2014). Integrating Team-Based Design Across the Curriculum at a Large Public University. Chemical Engineering Education. 48(3). 139–148. 6 indexed citations
12.
Seebauer, Edmund G., et al.. (2009). Chemical engineering at... the university of illinois at urbana-champaign. Chemical Engineering Education. 43(3). 179–185. 2 indexed citations
13.
Byl, Oleg, David J. Eldridge, R.E. Kaim, et al.. (2008). Development of “Static” In-Situ Implanter Chamber Cleaning. AIP conference proceedings. 376–379. 1 indexed citations
14.
Felch, Susan B., et al.. (2008). 17th international conference on ion implantation technology (IIT 2008). 1066. 1 indexed citations
15.
Seebauer, Edmund G., et al.. (2008). Ion Implantation Technology: 17th International Conference on Ion Implantation Technology. 1066. 1 indexed citations
16.
Vandervorst, W., M. Jurczak, T. Hoffman, et al.. (2008). Conformal Doping of FINFETs: a Fabrication and Metrology Challenge. AIP conference proceedings. 449–456. 23 indexed citations
17.
Seebauer, Edmund G.. (2004). Whistleblowing is it always obligatory. Chemical engineering progress. 100(6). 23–27. 2 indexed citations
18.
Seebauer, Edmund G. & Robert Barry. (2000). Fundamentals of ethics for scientists and engineers. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 18 indexed citations
19.
Idriss, Hicham & Edmund G. Seebauer. (1998). Photooxidation of Ethanol on Fe−Ti Oxide Particulates. Langmuir. 14(21). 6146–6150. 6 indexed citations
20.
Seebauer, Edmund G. & R. Ditchfield. (1997). Fixing hidden problems with thermal budget. Solid State Technology. 40(10). 111–120. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026