Edmund Booth

601 total citations
18 papers, 318 citations indexed

About

Edmund Booth is a scholar working on Civil and Structural Engineering, Geophysics and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Edmund Booth has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 318 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering, 3 papers in Geophysics and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Edmund Booth's work include Seismic Performance and Analysis (4 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (3 papers) and Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (2 papers). Edmund Booth is often cited by papers focused on Seismic Performance and Analysis (4 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (3 papers) and Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (2 papers). Edmund Booth collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Edmund Booth's co-authors include Robin Spence, Julian J. Bommer, Mustafa Erdik, Spg Madabhushi, Keiko Saito, Ronald T. Eguchi, S. Jenny, Emily So, H. Castella and Kayoko Saito and has published in prestigious journals such as Geomorphology, Engineering Structures and Earthquake Spectra.

In The Last Decade

Edmund Booth

16 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

Edmund Booth
Edmund Booth
Citations per year, relative to Edmund Booth Edmund Booth (= 1×) peers Mauro Onida

Countries citing papers authored by Edmund Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edmund Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edmund Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edmund Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edmund Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edmund Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edmund Booth. The network helps show where Edmund Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edmund Booth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edmund Booth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edmund Booth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edmund Booth. Edmund Booth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Conti, S., et al.. (2024). Observations on the role of internal sand moisture dynamics in wave-driven dune face erosion. Geomorphology. 462. 109331–109331. 3 indexed citations
3.
Grant, Damian & Edmund Booth. (2020). Earthquake Design Practice for Buildings. 5 indexed citations
4.
Booth, Edmund. (2018). Dealing with earthquakes: the practice of seismic engineering ‘as if people mattered’. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 16(4). 1661–1724. 14 indexed citations
5.
Booth, Edmund. (2014). Earthquake Design Practice for Buildings. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 12 indexed citations
6.
Lin, Lan, et al.. (2013). Selection of seismic excitations for nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete frame buildings. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 40(5). 411–426. 6 indexed citations
7.
Madabhushi, Spg, Kayoko Saito, & Edmund Booth. (2012). EEFIT mission to Haiti following the 12th January 2010 earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 11(1). 35–68. 13 indexed citations
8.
Booth, Edmund, Keiko Saito, Robin Spence, Spg Madabhushi, & Ronald T. Eguchi. (2011). Validating Assessments of Seismic Damage Made from Remote Sensing. Earthquake Spectra. 27(1S1). 157–177. 31 indexed citations
9.
Booth, Edmund, et al.. (2011). Eefit: the UK Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team. 164(3). 117–123. 5 indexed citations
10.
Spence, Robin, et al.. (2008). The Global Earthquake Vulnerability Estimation System (GEVES): an approach for earthquake risk assessment for insurance applications. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 6(3). 463–483. 26 indexed citations
11.
Booth, Edmund. (2007). The Estimation of Peak Ground-motion Parameters from Spectral Ordinates. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 11(1). 13–32. 20 indexed citations
12.
Bommer, Julian J., et al.. (2002). Development of an earthquake loss model for Turkish catastrophe insurance. Journal of Seismology. 6(3). 431–446. 113 indexed citations
13.
Booth, Edmund, et al.. (2001). Effect of the Bhuj, India earthquake of 26 January 2001 on heritage buildings. 1(1). 1 indexed citations
14.
Booth, Edmund. (1998). Earthquake-resistant concrete structures. Engineering Structures. 20(7). 644–644. 54 indexed citations
15.
Ramsey, Jerry D., et al.. (1998). SEISMIC RESPONSE OF PILES: SOME RECENT DESIGN STUDIES.. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering. 131(1). 23–33. 3 indexed citations
16.
Booth, Edmund. (1998). EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING IN THE 1990s: ACHIEVEMENTS, CONCERNS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS.. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings. 128(2). 154–166. 1 indexed citations
17.
Booth, Edmund. (1987). Design of new buildings for earthquake resistance. Structural Survey. 5(3). 207–217.
18.
Booth, Edmund. (1985). The Chile earthquake of March 1985. Disasters. 9(3). 190–196. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026