Earl Scime

6.0k citations
198 papers · 4.3k indexed · h-index 35

Earl Scime

187 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

Earl Scime
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.2k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.0k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.1k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 2.0k
  • Mechanics of Materials 847
Replace R. L. Stenzel with:
R. L. Stenzel United States
R. K. Janev North Macedonia
I. P. Shkarofsky Canada
A. Y. Wong United States
C. F. Driscoll United States
S. von Goeler United States
J. H. Malmberg United States
Yuri Ralchenko United States
F. S. Porter United States
Yoshiharu Nakamura Japan
Earl Scime relative to R. L. Stenzel United States R. L. Stenzel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
R. L. Stenzel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Earl Scime

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Earl Scime's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Earl Scime with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Earl Scime more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Earl Scime

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Earl Scime. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Earl Scime. The network helps show where Earl Scime may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Earl Scime, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Earl Scime Line = papers co-authored together Earl Scime links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20240
4 20234
5 202210
6 20214
7 202116
8 20203
9 202013
10 20207
11 20180
12 20183
13 20179
14 20176
15 20171
16 20166
17 20167
18 20166
19 20166
20 20157

About Earl Scime

Earl Scime is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 198 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (98 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (82 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (52 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (52 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (51 papers), Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena (32 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (24 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.2k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.0k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.1k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (2.0k citations) and Mechanics of Materials (847 citations). Earl Scime has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Robert Boivin, A. M. Keesee, Xuan Sun, J. L. Kline, J. L. Phillips, Costel Biloiu, D. J. McComas, E. Marsch, M. Maksimović and S. J. Bame. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Review of Scientific Instruments, Plasma Sources Science and Technology, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and Geophysical Research Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026