E. Wells

897 total citations
48 papers, 738 citations indexed

About

E. Wells is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, E. Wells has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 738 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 34 papers in Spectroscopy and 7 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in E. Wells's work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (33 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (22 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (22 papers). E. Wells is often cited by papers focused on Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (33 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (22 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (22 papers). E. Wells collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and India. E. Wells's co-authors include I. Ben-Itzhak, R. R. Jones, Merrick J. DeWitt, K. D. Carnes, B. D. Esry, Bethany Jochim, Vidhya Krishnamurthi, B. D. DePaola, Hai Truong Nguyen and X. Fléchard and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and The Journal of Chemical Physics.

In The Last Decade

E. Wells

47 papers receiving 709 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E. Wells United States 16 715 407 73 71 49 48 738
Robert Moshammer Germany 15 728 1.0× 326 0.8× 79 1.1× 129 1.8× 44 0.9× 27 746
Kang Lin China 19 974 1.4× 437 1.1× 43 0.6× 94 1.3× 26 0.5× 54 1.0k
Thomas Pflüger Germany 16 565 0.8× 378 0.9× 116 1.6× 32 0.5× 91 1.9× 32 598
Tomoya Okino Japan 22 1.1k 1.6× 658 1.6× 126 1.7× 150 2.1× 59 1.2× 44 1.2k
Qinying Ji China 18 885 1.2× 436 1.1× 48 0.7× 78 1.1× 28 0.6× 39 896
Pengqian Wang United States 16 744 1.0× 407 1.0× 128 1.8× 105 1.5× 43 0.9× 48 797
J. Fernández Spain 13 592 0.8× 289 0.7× 38 0.5× 43 0.6× 25 0.5× 22 608
Xiaoxu Guan United States 14 588 0.8× 209 0.5× 56 0.8× 91 1.3× 11 0.2× 29 603
Stefan Roither Austria 21 933 1.3× 532 1.3× 96 1.3× 115 1.6× 35 0.7× 27 949
Gregory Armstrong United Kingdom 13 362 0.5× 121 0.3× 80 1.1× 57 0.8× 12 0.2× 29 393

Countries citing papers authored by E. Wells

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Wells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Wells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Wells more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Wells

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Wells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Wells. The network helps show where E. Wells may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Wells

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Wells. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Wells based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Wells. E. Wells is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Severt, T., Farzaneh Ziaee, Kurtis Borne, et al.. (2025). Strong-field double ionization of formic acid leading to hydrogen elimination and multibody fragmentation. Physical review. A. 112(4). 1 indexed citations
2.
Severt, T., B. Kaderiya, Peyman Feizollah, et al.. (2024). Initial-site characterization of hydrogen migration following strong-field double-ionization of ethanol. Nature Communications. 15(1). 74–74. 9 indexed citations
3.
Schwartz, Charles J., Bethany Jochim, Kanaka Raju P., et al.. (2021). Controlling H3+ Formation From Ethane Using Shaped Ultrafast Laser Pulses. Frontiers in Physics. 9. 10 indexed citations
4.
Iwamoto, Naoki, Charles J. Schwartz, Bethany Jochim, et al.. (2020). Strong-field control of H3+ production from methanol dications: Selecting between local and extended formation mechanisms. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 152(5). 54302–54302. 19 indexed citations
6.
Jochim, Bethany, R. Siemering, M. Zohrabi, et al.. (2017). The importance of Rydberg orbitals in dissociative ionization of small hydrocarbon molecules in intense laser fields. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 4441–4441. 5 indexed citations
7.
Ren, Xiaoming, Matthias F. Kling, Shuting Lei, et al.. (2015). Carrier-envelope-phase stabilized terawatt class laser at 1 kHz with a wavelength tunable option. Optics Express. 23(4). 4563–4563. 22 indexed citations
8.
Zohrabi, M., Sankar De, Boris Bergues, et al.. (2014). Incorporating real time velocity map image reconstruction into closed-loop coherent control. Review of Scientific Instruments. 85(11). 113105–113105. 14 indexed citations
9.
Wells, E., M. Zohrabi, R. Siemering, et al.. (2013). Adaptive strong-field control of chemical dynamics guided by three-dimensional momentum imaging. Nature Communications. 4(1). 2895–2895. 46 indexed citations
10.
Jochim, Bethany, J. A. McKenna, Sankar De, et al.. (2011). Velocity map imaging as a tool for gaining mechanistic insight from closed-loop control studies of molecular fragmentation. Physical Review A. 83(4). 6 indexed citations
11.
Wells, E., Michael A. Todt, Bethany Jochim, et al.. (2009). Examining the feedback signals used in closed-loop control of intense laser fragmentation ofCO+. Physical Review A. 80(6). 5 indexed citations
12.
Wells, E., et al.. (2008). Soft fragmentation of carbon monoxide by slow highly charged ions. Physical Review A. 77(6). 11 indexed citations
13.
Johnson, Nora G., et al.. (2005). Single ionization of hydrogen molecules by fast protons as a function of the molecular alignment. Physical Review A. 72(5). 4 indexed citations
14.
Wells, E., I. Ben-Itzhak, & R. R. Jones. (2004). Ionization of Atoms by the Spatial Gradient of the Pondermotive Potential in a Focused Laser Beam. Physical Review Letters. 93(2). 23001–23001. 21 indexed citations
15.
DeWitt, Merrick J., E. Wells, & R. R. Jones. (2001). Ratiometric Comparison of Intense Field Ionization of Atoms and Diatomic Molecules. Physical Review Letters. 87(15). 153001–153001. 85 indexed citations
16.
Wells, E., K. D. Carnes, B. D. Esry, & I. Ben-Itzhak. (2001). Charge Transfer and Elastic Scattering in Very SlowH++D(1s)Half Collisions. Physical Review Letters. 86(21). 4803–4806. 14 indexed citations
17.
Fléchard, X., Hai Truong Nguyen, E. Wells, I. Ben-Itzhak, & B. D. DePaola. (2001). Kinematically Complete Charge Exchange Experiment in theCs++RbCollision System Using a MOT Target. Physical Review Letters. 87(12). 123203–123203. 51 indexed citations
18.
Ben-Itzhak, I., et al.. (2001). Double and single ionization of hydrogen molecules by fast-proton impact. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 34(6). 1143–1161. 11 indexed citations
19.
Esry, B. D., H. R. Sadeghpour, E. Wells, & I. Ben-Itzhak. (2000). Charge exchange in slow H++ D(1s) collisions. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 33(23). 5329–5341. 20 indexed citations
20.
Barnett, C. F., J. L. Dunlap, R. S. Edwards, et al.. (1961). Energy distributions of protons in DCX. Nuclear Fusion. 1(4). 264–272. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026