E. W. Emmart

568 total citations
22 papers, 382 citations indexed

About

E. W. Emmart is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cell Biology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, E. W. Emmart has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 382 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 4 papers in Cell Biology and 3 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in E. W. Emmart's work include Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (5 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (3 papers) and Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (3 papers). E. W. Emmart is often cited by papers focused on Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (5 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (3 papers) and Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (3 papers). E. W. Emmart collaborates with scholars based in United States and Poland. E. W. Emmart's co-authors include Alfred E. Wilhelmi, Grace E. Pickford, Roderick W. Bates, William Turner, Mirosław Jan Mossakowski, S. S. Spicer, Roger M. Cole, Einar A. Helander, I. Klatzo and James B. Longley and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Biochemical Pharmacology.

In The Last Decade

E. W. Emmart

20 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E. W. Emmart United States 11 106 96 95 80 79 22 382
Christian Salmon France 11 237 2.2× 135 1.4× 24 0.3× 37 0.5× 33 0.4× 26 381
T T Chen United States 6 43 0.4× 55 0.6× 24 0.3× 166 2.1× 161 2.0× 7 367
Jun-ichiro Hata Japan 10 58 0.5× 51 0.5× 25 0.3× 138 1.7× 212 2.7× 17 465
Brian Brown United States 12 21 0.2× 37 0.4× 48 0.5× 56 0.7× 185 2.3× 20 427
W. E. Griesbach New Zealand 11 22 0.2× 13 0.1× 38 0.4× 291 3.6× 73 0.9× 19 604
Pedro J. Alfonso United States 11 29 0.3× 39 0.4× 123 1.3× 13 0.2× 355 4.5× 11 552
T. Hirai Japan 10 195 1.8× 97 1.0× 12 0.1× 30 0.4× 124 1.6× 23 421
Nathalie Guitton France 13 77 0.7× 65 0.7× 19 0.2× 10 0.1× 199 2.5× 15 484
Reggie H. Stevens United States 6 29 0.3× 15 0.2× 8 0.1× 82 1.0× 99 1.3× 7 467
Tatsuhiro Sakamoto Japan 7 32 0.3× 63 0.7× 40 0.4× 71 0.9× 55 0.7× 36 279

Countries citing papers authored by E. W. Emmart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. W. Emmart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. W. Emmart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. W. Emmart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. W. Emmart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. W. Emmart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. W. Emmart. The network helps show where E. W. Emmart may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. W. Emmart

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. W. Emmart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. W. Emmart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. W. Emmart. E. W. Emmart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Emmart, E. W.. (2019). A New Tuberculostatic Antibiotic from a Species of Nocardia1. American Review of Tuberculosis.
2.
Emmart, E. W. & Mirosław Jan Mossakowski. (1970). The behavior and appearance in tissue culture of rostral pituitary cells from Fundulus heteroclitus linnaeus. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 14(3). 517–523. 2 indexed citations
3.
Emmart, E. W.. (1969). The localization of endogenous “prolactin” in the pituitary gland of the goldfish, Carassius auratus, linnaeus. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 12(3). 519–525. 42 indexed citations
4.
Emmart, E. W. & Alfred E. Wilhelmi. (1968). Immunochemical studies with prolactin-like fractions of fish pituitaries. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 11(3). 515–527. 31 indexed citations
5.
Emmart, E. W. & Mirosław Jan Mossakowski. (1967). The localization of prolactin in cultured cells of the rostral pars distalis of the pituitary of Fundulus heteroclitus (Linnaeus). General and Comparative Endocrinology. 9(3). 391–400. 32 indexed citations
6.
Emmart, E. W., Grace E. Pickford, & Alfred E. Wilhelmi. (1966). Localization of prolactin within the pituitary of a cyprinodont fish, Fundulus heteroclitus (Linnaeus), by specific fluorescent antiovine prolactin globulin. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 7(3). 571–583. 81 indexed citations
7.
Emmart, E. W., Roderick W. Bates, & William Turner. (1965). LOCALIZATION OF PROLACTIN IN RAT PITUITARY AND IN A TRANSPLANTABLE MAMMOTROPIC PITUITARY TUMOR USING FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. 13(3). 182–190. 23 indexed citations
8.
Emmart, E. W., S. S. Spicer, & Roderick W. Bates. (1963). LOCALIZATION OF PROLACTIN WITHIN THE PITUITARY BY SPECIFIC FLUORESCENT ANTIPROLACTIN GLOBULIN. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. 11(3). 365–373. 18 indexed citations
9.
Emmart, E. W., Robert Schimke, S. S. Spicer, & William Turner. (1963). The localization of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase in kidney tissue by means of fluorescent antibody. Experimental Cell Research. 30(3). 460–475. 4 indexed citations
10.
Emmart, E. W., Roderick W. Bates, Peter G. Condliffe, & William Turner. (1963). Immunochemical Studies with Ovine Prolactin. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 114(3). 754–763. 13 indexed citations
11.
Webster, Marion E., E. W. Emmart, William Turner, Hiroshi Moriya, & Jack V. Pierce. (1963). Immunological properties of the kallikreins. Biochemical Pharmacology. 12(5). 511–519. 17 indexed citations
12.
13.
Emmart, E. W. & William Turner. (1960). STUDIES ON STREPTOCOCCAL HYALURONIDASE AND ANTIHYALURONIDASE. III. THE PRODUCTION AND CELLULAR LOCALIZATION OF HYALURONIDASE FOLLOWING STREPTOCOCCAL INFECTION. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. 8(4). 273–283. 4 indexed citations
14.
Helander, Einar A. & E. W. Emmart. (1959). Localization of Myosin in the Conduction Bundle of Beef Heart. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 101(4). 838–842. 10 indexed citations
15.
Emmart, E. W., Roger M. Cole, Ekkehard May, & James B. Longley. (1958). STUDIES ON STREPTOCOCCAL HYALURONIDASE AND ANTIHYALURONIDASE. II. THE LOCALIZATION OF SITES OF ABSORPTION OF STREPTOCOCCAL HYALURONIDASE (GROUP C) WITH FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. 6(3). 161–173. 6 indexed citations
16.
Emmart, E. W.. (1958). Observations on the absorption spectra of fluorescein, fluorescein derivatives and conjugates. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 73(1). 1–8. 38 indexed citations
17.
Klatzo, I., et al.. (1958). Demonstration of Myosin in Human Striated Muscle by Fluorescent Antibody. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 97(1). 135–140. 14 indexed citations
18.
Emmart, E. W. & Roger M. Cole. (1955). STUDIES ON STREPTOCOCCAL HYALURONIDASE AND ANTIHYALURONIDASE I. Journal of Bacteriology. 70(5). 596–607. 9 indexed citations
19.
Emmart, E. W. & James B. Longley. (1954). THE REACTIVATION OF HEAT-INACTIVATED HYALURONIDASE. The Journal of General Physiology. 37(3). 361–371. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026