E. Parke

717 total citations
36 papers, 363 citations indexed

About

E. Parke is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, E. Parke has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 363 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 15 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 10 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in E. Parke's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (18 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (11 papers) and Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (9 papers). E. Parke is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (18 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (11 papers) and Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (9 papers). E. Parke collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Italy. E. Parke's co-authors include K. D. Carnes, I. Ben-Itzhak, Nora G. Johnson, B. Gaire, A. M. Sayler, J. A. McKenna, B. D. Esry, D. J. Den Hartog, Fatima Anis and D. L. Brower and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A and Review of Scientific Instruments.

In The Last Decade

E. Parke

35 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E. Parke United States 11 248 131 123 80 59 36 363
P. Breger United Kingdom 12 253 1.0× 127 1.0× 128 1.0× 160 2.0× 52 0.9× 25 371
K. Tsigutkin United States 11 318 1.3× 182 1.4× 35 0.3× 100 1.3× 58 1.0× 25 428
Donghoon Kuk United States 7 166 0.7× 199 1.5× 52 0.4× 99 1.2× 114 1.9× 15 327
L. Godbert‐Mouret France 12 160 0.6× 258 2.0× 61 0.5× 231 2.9× 33 0.6× 54 392
V.P. Shevelko Russia 9 343 1.4× 102 0.8× 118 1.0× 73 0.9× 28 0.5× 36 383
E. M. George Germany 8 135 0.5× 58 0.4× 79 0.6× 24 0.3× 148 2.5× 26 315
L. Bagge Sweden 8 299 1.2× 50 0.4× 120 1.0× 37 0.5× 35 0.6× 16 323
S. Borneis Germany 9 321 1.3× 187 1.4× 65 0.5× 68 0.8× 81 1.4× 23 403
S. Bernitt Germany 10 293 1.2× 39 0.3× 96 0.8× 75 0.9× 12 0.2× 20 324
H. Knopp Germany 12 345 1.4× 58 0.4× 124 1.0× 95 1.2× 24 0.4× 22 359

Countries citing papers authored by E. Parke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Parke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Parke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Parke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Parke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Parke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Parke. The network helps show where E. Parke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Parke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Parke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Parke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Parke. E. Parke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bonofiglo, P. J., J. K. Anderson, M. Gobbin, et al.. (2019). Fast ion transport in the quasi-single helical reversed-field pinch. Physics of Plasmas. 26(2). 5 indexed citations
2.
Zhai, K., et al.. (2018). Thomson scattering systems on C-2W field-reversed configuration plasma experiment. Review of Scientific Instruments. 89(10). 10C118–10C118. 12 indexed citations
3.
Li, Zichao, K. J. McCollam, T. Nishizawa, et al.. (2018). Effects of oscillating poloidal current drive on magnetic relaxation in the Madison Symmetric Torus reversed-field pinch. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 61(4). 45004–45004. 1 indexed citations
4.
Schindler, T., et al.. (2018). Characterization and calibration of the Thomson scattering diagnostic suite for the C-2W field-reversed configuration experiment. Review of Scientific Instruments. 89(10). 10C120–10C120. 9 indexed citations
5.
Parke, E., et al.. (2016). An upgraded interferometer-polarimeter system for broadband fluctuation measurements. Review of Scientific Instruments. 87(11). 11E115–11E115. 5 indexed citations
6.
Mirnov, V.V., D. J. Den Hartog, & E. Parke. (2016). Exact relativistic expressions for polarization of incoherent Thomson scattering. Physics of Plasmas. 23(5). 8 indexed citations
7.
Mao, Wenzhe, B. E. Chapman, W. X. Ding, et al.. (2015). Physics and optimization of plasma startup in the RFP. Nuclear Fusion. 55(5). 53004–53004. 2 indexed citations
8.
Parke, E.. (2014). Diagnosis of equilibrium magnetic profiles, current transport, and internal structures in a reversed-field pinch using electron temperature fluctuations. 1 indexed citations
9.
Mirnov, V.V., et al.. (2014). Electron kinetic effects on interferometry, polarimetry and Thomson scattering measurements in burning plasmas (invited). Review of Scientific Instruments. 85(11). 11D302–11D302. 10 indexed citations
10.
Parke, E., et al.. (2013). Detailed modeling of the statistical uncertainty of Thomson scattering measurements. Journal of Instrumentation. 8(11). C11003–C11003. 3 indexed citations
11.
Parke, E., D. J. Den Hartog, C. Kasten, et al.. (2012). Improvements to the calibration of the MST Thomson scattering diagnostic. Review of Scientific Instruments. 83(10). 10E324–10E324. 2 indexed citations
12.
Anderson, J. K., M. D. Nornberg, E. Parke, et al.. (2012). Neutral beam heating of a RFP plasma in MST. Physics of Plasmas. 19(12). 11 indexed citations
13.
Mirnov, V.V., et al.. (2012). Electron Kinetic Effects on Interferometry, Polarimetry and Thomson Scattering in Burning Plasmas. 2 indexed citations
14.
Kumar, S. T. A., D. J. Den Hartog, B. E. Chapman, et al.. (2011). High resolution charge-exchange spectroscopic measurements of aluminum impurity ions in a high temperature plasma. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 54(1). 12002–12002. 13 indexed citations
15.
Franz, P., P. Piovesan, M. Spolaore, et al.. (2010). Helical Magnetic Self-Organization in the RFX-mod and MST devices. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 52. 1 indexed citations
16.
Gaire, B., J. A. McKenna, Nora G. Johnson, et al.. (2009). Laser-induced multiple ionization of molecular ion beams:N2+,CO+,NO+, andO2+. Physical Review A. 79(6). 12 indexed citations
17.
McKenna, J. A., A. M. Sayler, B. Gaire, et al.. (2009). Dissociation and ionization of anHD+beam induced by intense 395-nm ultrashort laser pulses. Physical Review A. 80(2). 6 indexed citations
18.
McKenna, J. A., A. M. Sayler, Fatima Anis, et al.. (2008). Enhancing High-Order Above-Threshold Dissociation ofH2+Beams with Few-Cycle Laser Pulses. Physical Review Letters. 100(13). 133001–133001. 80 indexed citations
19.
McKenna, J. A., A. M. Sayler, B. Gaire, et al.. (2008). Intensity dependence in the dissociation branching ratio ofND+using intense femtosecond laser pulses. Physical Review A. 77(6). 10 indexed citations
20.
Johnson, Nora G., et al.. (2005). Single ionization of hydrogen molecules by fast protons as a function of the molecular alignment. Physical Review A. 72(5). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026