Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The land mobile satellite communication channel-recording, statistics, and channel model
1991553 citationsE. Lutz, Daniel Cygan et al.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Lutz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Lutz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Lutz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Lutz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Lutz. The network helps show where E. Lutz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Lutz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Lutz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Lutz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E. Lutz. E. Lutz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lutz, E., et al.. (1999). Aeronautical Multimedia Service Demonstration at K/KA Band. elib (German Aerospace Center).9 indexed citations
6.
Jahn, Andreas, et al.. (1998). Aeronautical Channel Characterisation Measurements at K Band. elib (German Aerospace Center).7 indexed citations
7.
Lutz, E.. (1997). Other-cell Interference in Satellite Power-controlled CDMA Uplink. elib (German Aerospace Center).8 indexed citations
8.
Jahn, Α. & E. Lutz. (1997). LMS Channel Measurements at EHF-Band.. elib (German Aerospace Center).5 indexed citations
9.
Lutz, E., Α. Jahn, Markus Werner, & Hermann Bischl. (1996). DLR Activities in the Field of Personal Satellite Communications Systems.. elib (German Aerospace Center). 14(2). 111–121.3 indexed citations
10.
Bischl, Hermann, Α. Jahn, & E. Lutz. (1996). Wideband Channel Model for UMTS Satellite Communications - Detailed Model -. elib (German Aerospace Center).3 indexed citations
11.
Evans, B.G., et al.. (1996). SECOMS demonstrators for broadband mobile satellite links at Ka and EHF bands. elib (German Aerospace Center).
Lutz, E.. (1992). Land Mobile Satellite Communications Systems and Services. elib (German Aerospace Center). 51–55.2 indexed citations
15.
Lutz, E., Daniel Cygan, Michael Dippold, F. Dolainsky, & W. Papke. (1991). The land mobile satellite communication channel-recording, statistics, and channel model. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 40(2). 375–386.553 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Schäfer, Wolfgang & E. Lutz. (1991). Assessment of Frequencies for Prometheus and Drive - The 60 GHz Mobile Radio Channel.. elib (German Aerospace Center).1 indexed citations
17.
Lutz, E., Daniel Cygan, Michael Dippold, F. Dolainsky, & W. Papke. (1991). The land mobile satellite channel - recording, statistics and channel model. elib (German Aerospace Center).21 indexed citations
Lutz, E., et al.. (1986). Land mobile satellite communications: Channel model, modulation, and error control. 37–42.18 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.