E. L. Forker

1.7k total citations
33 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

E. L. Forker is a scholar working on Oncology, Epidemiology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, E. L. Forker has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Oncology, 13 papers in Epidemiology and 12 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in E. L. Forker's work include Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (13 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (12 papers) and Muscle metabolism and nutrition (6 papers). E. L. Forker is often cited by papers focused on Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (13 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (12 papers) and Muscle metabolism and nutrition (6 papers). E. L. Forker collaborates with scholars based in United States. E. L. Forker's co-authors include Bruce A. Luxon, Douglas E. Brenneman, William E. Connor, Frank J. Burczynski, Zhengchun Cai, John Moran, Gary E. Gibson, Bruce A. Runyon, Vandna Sharma and Julio Morán and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Gastroenterology.

In The Last Decade

E. L. Forker

31 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E. L. Forker United States 20 833 341 316 287 253 33 1.3k
P. Czygan Germany 21 759 0.9× 333 1.0× 403 1.3× 520 1.8× 336 1.3× 83 1.8k
Jorge J. Gumucio United States 22 488 0.6× 283 0.8× 315 1.0× 385 1.3× 432 1.7× 52 1.3k
Alan Medline Canada 22 571 0.7× 660 1.9× 319 1.0× 444 1.5× 130 0.5× 31 2.2k
Ferenc Hutterer United States 26 1.2k 1.4× 451 1.3× 781 2.5× 578 2.0× 653 2.6× 62 2.7k
María J. Perez Spain 21 636 0.8× 414 1.2× 314 1.0× 388 1.4× 213 0.8× 32 1.5k
Susan Hauser United States 16 644 0.8× 430 1.3× 819 2.6× 197 0.7× 333 1.3× 18 1.4k
Z. Reno Vlahčevič United States 19 845 1.0× 303 0.9× 1.5k 4.8× 421 1.5× 152 0.6× 35 2.2k
Toshinori Kamisako Japan 20 604 0.7× 392 1.1× 325 1.0× 221 0.8× 176 0.7× 63 1.3k
Douglas M. Heuman United States 10 503 0.6× 226 0.7× 312 1.0× 228 0.8× 418 1.7× 15 1.0k
A Radominska United States 23 549 0.7× 506 1.5× 196 0.6× 85 0.3× 443 1.8× 45 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by E. L. Forker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. L. Forker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. L. Forker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. L. Forker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. L. Forker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. L. Forker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. L. Forker. The network helps show where E. L. Forker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. L. Forker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. L. Forker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. L. Forker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. L. Forker. E. L. Forker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chicone, Carmen, et al.. (1993). A parameter identification problem arising from a model of canalicular bile formation. Journal of Mathematical Biology. 31(3). 273–289.
2.
Cai, Zhengchun, Frank J. Burczynski, Bruce A. Luxon, & E. L. Forker. (1992). On the design and interpretation of experiments to elucidate albumin-dependent hepatic uptake. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 262(6). G1127–G1137. 10 indexed citations
3.
Burczynski, Frank J., John Moran, Zhengchun Cai, & E. L. Forker. (1990). β-Lactoglobulin enhances the uptake of free palmitate by hepatocyte monolayers: the relative importance of diffusion and facilitated dissociation. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 68(2). 201–206. 21 indexed citations
4.
Burczynski, Frank J., Zhengchun Cai, John Moran, & E. L. Forker. (1989). Palmitate uptake by cultured hepatocytes: albumin binding and stagnant layer phenomena. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 257(4). G584–G593. 30 indexed citations
5.
Forker, E. L. & Camillo A. Ghiron. (1988). ESR, albumin, and the riddle of organic anion uptake by the liver. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 254(4). G463–G464. 9 indexed citations
6.
Morán, Julio, et al.. (1987). Protein binding of palmitate measured by transmembrane diffusion through polyethylene. Analytical Biochemistry. 167(2). 394–399. 28 indexed citations
7.
Luxon, Bruce A., et al.. (1986). Palmitate uptake by hepatocyte monolayers. Effect of albumin binding.. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 77(3). 964–970. 41 indexed citations
8.
Luxon, Bruce A., Paul D. King, & E. L. Forker. (1986). Only free bile acid drives ileal absorption of taurocholate. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 250(5). G648–G652. 1 indexed citations
9.
Forker, E. L., Bruce A. Luxon, & Vandna Sharma. (1985). Hepatic transport and binding of rose bengal in the presence of albumin and gamma globulin. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 248(6). G702–G708. 20 indexed citations
10.
Forker, E. L. & Bruce A. Luxon. (1983). Albumin-mediated transport of rose bengal by perfused rat liver. Kinetics of the reaction at the cell surface.. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 72(5). 1764–1771. 88 indexed citations
11.
Forker, E. L. & Bruce A. Luxon. (1983). Albumin Binding and Hepatic Uptake: The Importance of Model Selection. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 72(10). 1232–1233. 19 indexed citations
12.
Forker, E. L., et al.. (1982). Effect of albumin binding on the hepatic transport of rose bengal: surface-mediated dissociation of limited capacity.. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 223(2). 342–347. 65 indexed citations
13.
Luxon, Bruce A. & E. L. Forker. (1982). Simulation and analysis of hepatic indicator dilution curves. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 243(1). G76–G89. 7 indexed citations
14.
Forker, E. L. & Bruce A. Luxon. (1981). Albumin helps mediate removal of taurocholate by rat liver.. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 67(5). 1517–1522. 160 indexed citations
15.
Runyon, Bruce A., et al.. (1979). Pleural-fluid kinetics in a patient with primary lymphedema, pleural effusions, and yellow nails.. PubMed. 119(5). 821–5. 26 indexed citations
16.
Forker, E. L. & Bruce A. Luxon. (1978). Hepatic transport kinetics and plasma disappearance curves: distributed modeling versus conventional approach.. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 235(6). E648–E648. 63 indexed citations
17.
Forker, E. L.. (1977). Mechanisms of Hepatic Bile Formation. Annual Review of Physiology. 39(1). 323–347. 137 indexed citations
18.
Brenneman, Douglas E., et al.. (1972). The formation of abnormal bile and cholesterol gallstones from dietary cholesterol in the prairie dog. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 51(6). 1495–1503. 104 indexed citations
19.
Forker, E. L.. (1972). Assessing Changes in Canalicular Permeability. Gastroenterology. 63(1). 205–207. 1 indexed citations
20.
Forker, E. L. & C. Adrian M. Hogben. (1967). Diodrast transit time in guinea pig biliary tree. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content. 212(1). 104–112. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026