E. Heller

610 total citations
80 papers, 402 citations indexed

About

E. Heller is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, E. Heller has authored 80 papers receiving a total of 402 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 75 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 38 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 11 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in E. Heller's work include Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (42 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (37 papers) and Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (25 papers). E. Heller is often cited by papers focused on Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (42 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (37 papers) and Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (25 papers). E. Heller collaborates with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Switzerland. E. Heller's co-authors include F. Jain, J. Chandy, E. Suarez, Supriya Karmakar, El-Sayed Hasaneen, B.I. Miller, Rishi Bansal, Wenli Huang, J. I. Budnick and B.L. Chamberland and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Physical Review Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.

In The Last Decade

E. Heller

65 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E. Heller United States 11 332 141 50 47 46 80 402
Danny Wan Belgium 11 265 0.8× 221 1.6× 41 0.8× 19 0.4× 18 0.4× 34 386
Josh Mutus Canada 6 215 0.6× 187 1.3× 26 0.5× 104 2.2× 25 0.5× 12 279
U. Auer Germany 11 423 1.3× 210 1.5× 22 0.4× 32 0.7× 59 1.3× 46 466
A. V. Kozhevnikov Russia 11 238 0.7× 256 1.8× 31 0.6× 7 0.1× 33 0.7× 55 329
Prashant Sharma United States 9 114 0.3× 292 2.1× 95 1.9× 27 0.6× 9 0.2× 11 400
Pierre-André Mortemousque France 12 183 0.6× 345 2.4× 25 0.5× 27 0.6× 30 0.7× 24 392
Julien Camirand Lemyre Canada 10 261 0.8× 334 2.4× 81 1.6× 14 0.3× 20 0.4× 15 461
Maximilian G. Schultz Switzerland 5 217 0.7× 288 2.0× 17 0.3× 19 0.4× 29 0.6× 6 331
V.J. Law United Kingdom 13 311 0.9× 272 1.9× 44 0.9× 6 0.1× 27 0.6× 39 423
Dharmraj Kotekar‐Patil France 7 420 1.3× 541 3.8× 59 1.2× 20 0.4× 28 0.6× 15 660

Countries citing papers authored by E. Heller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Heller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Heller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Heller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Heller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Heller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Heller. The network helps show where E. Heller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Heller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Heller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Heller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Heller. E. Heller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Heller, E., et al.. (2024). The Static Noise Margin (SNM) of Quaternary SRAM using Quantum SWS-FET. International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems. 33(02n03).
2.
Stone, Bryan D., et al.. (2024). Designing hybrid imaging systems with metalenses and refractive elements. 17–17. 1 indexed citations
3.
Chandy, J., et al.. (2023). Propagation Delay and Power Dissipation Analysis for a 2-Bit SRAM Using Multi-State SWS Inverter. International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems. 32(02n04).
4.
Heller, E., et al.. (2023). Compute-in-Memory SRAM Cell Using Multistate Spatial Wavefunction Switched (SWS)-Quantum Dot Channel (QDC) FET. International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems. 32(02n04). 3 indexed citations
5.
Chandy, J., et al.. (2022). Propagation Delay Evaluation for Spatial Wavefunction Switched (SWS) FET-Based Inverter. International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems. 31(01n04). 2 indexed citations
6.
Kondo, J., et al.. (2017). An Investigation of Quantum Dot Super Lattice Use in Nonvolatile Memory and Transistors. Journal of Electronic Materials. 47(2). 1371–1382. 2 indexed citations
7.
Царев, А.В., et al.. (2017). Polymer electro-optic modulator efficiency enhancement by the high permittivity dielectric strips. Photonics and Nanostructures - Fundamentals and Applications. 25. 31–37. 4 indexed citations
8.
Chandy, J., et al.. (2017). Multi-Bit NVRAMs Using Quantum Dot Gate Access Channel. 99–112.
9.
Kondo, J., et al.. (2015). Quantum Dot Channel (QDC) Field Effect Transistors (FETs) and Floating Gate Nonvolatile Memory Cells. Journal of Electronic Materials. 44(9). 3188–3193. 3 indexed citations
10.
Mena, Pablo, et al.. (2014). Mixed-level optical-system simulation incorporating component-level modeling of interface elements. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8991. 899111–899111. 1 indexed citations
11.
Jain, F., E. Suarez, J. Kondo, et al.. (2013). Four-State Sub-12-nm FETs Employing Lattice-Matched II–VI Barrier Layers. Journal of Electronic Materials. 42(11). 3191–3202. 7 indexed citations
12.
Baskar, K., et al.. (2013). Novel Multistate Quantum Dot Gate FETs Using SiO2 and Lattice-Matched ZnS-ZnMgS-ZnS as Gate Insulators. Journal of Electronic Materials. 42(11). 3156–3163. 9 indexed citations
13.
Gogna, P., et al.. (2012). Efficient multi-bit SRAMs using spatial wavefunction switched (SWS)-FETs. 48. 1–4. 2 indexed citations
14.
Jain, F., J. Chandy, B.I. Miller, El-Sayed Hasaneen, & E. Heller. (2011). SPATIAL WAVEFUNCTION-SWITCHED (SWS)-FET: A NOVEL DEVICE TO PROCESS MULTIPLE BITS SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH SUB-PICOSECOND DELAYS. International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems. 20(3). 641–652. 16 indexed citations
15.
Jain, F., E. Heller, & J. Chandy. (2010). Spatial Wavefunction Switched (SWS) Field-Effect Transistors: Computing Using More Than Few Electrons. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2010. 1 indexed citations
16.
Suarez, E., et al.. (2010). Nonvolatile Memories Using Quantum Dot (QD) Floating Gates Assembled on II–VI Tunnel Insulators. Journal of Electronic Materials. 39(7). 903–907. 14 indexed citations
17.
Jain, F., E. Heller, Supriya Karmakar, & J. Chandy. (2007). Device and circuit modeling using novel 3-state quantum dot gate FETs. 10 indexed citations
18.
Heller, E., et al.. (2005). Simulation of carrier dependent absorption effects in silicon optical waveguide devices (Invited Paper). Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5722. 482–482. 2 indexed citations
19.
Heller, E., et al.. (2003). Integration of microscopic gain modeling into a commercial laser simulation environment. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 4986. 413–413.
20.
Parent, David, et al.. (1997). A comparison of ethyl iodide and hydrogen chloride for doping ZnSe grown by photoassisted MOVPE. Journal of Electronic Materials. 26(6). 710–714. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026