Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
HAEMODYNAMIC CHANGES DURING ANAESTHESIA INDUCED AND MAINTAINED WITH PROPOFOL
1988396 citationsMathias Claeys, E. Gepts et al.British Journal of Anaesthesiaprofile →
Disposition of Propofol Administered as Constant Rate Intravenous Infusions in Humans
1987362 citationsE. Gepts, F. Camu et al.Anesthesia & Analgesiaprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Gepts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Gepts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Gepts more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Gepts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Gepts. The network helps show where E. Gepts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Gepts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Gepts.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Gepts based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E. Gepts. E. Gepts is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Woestenborghs, Robert, Philip Timmerman, E. Gepts, et al.. (1994). Assay Methods for Sufentanil in Plasma. Anesthesiology. 80(3). 666–670.29 indexed citations
Claeys, Mathias, E. Gepts, & F. Camu. (1988). HAEMODYNAMIC CHANGES DURING ANAESTHESIA INDUCED AND MAINTAINED WITH PROPOFOL. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 60(1). 3–9.396 indexed citations breakdown →
Claeys, M. A., F. Camu, I Schneider, & E. Gepts. (1988). Reversal of flunitrazepam with flumazenil: duration of antagonist activity.. PubMed. 2. 209–17.8 indexed citations
12.
Gepts, E., F. Camu, I. D. Cockshott, & Elaine Douglas. (1987). Disposition of Propofol Administered as Constant Rate Intravenous Infusions in Humans. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 66(12). 1256???1263–1256???1263.362 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Gepts, E., et al.. (1987). Pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered meptazinol during general anaesthesia in man.. PubMed. 4(1). 35–43.3 indexed citations
Gepts, E., et al.. (1985). Pharmacokinetics of propofol ('Diprivan') administered by continuous intravenous infusion in man. A preliminary report.. PubMed. 61 Suppl 3. 51–2.20 indexed citations
17.
Gepts, E., et al.. (1985). Infusion of propofol ('Diprivan') as sedative technique for colonoscopies.. PubMed. 61 Suppl 3. 120–6.46 indexed citations
Gepts, E. & F. Camu. (1981). Total intravenous anesthesia with etomidate for microlaryngoscopy. Applicability and shortcomings.. PubMed. 32(3). 177–84.1 indexed citations
20.
Camu, F. & E. Gepts. (1979). Analgesic properties of dezocine for relief of postoperative pain.. PubMed. 30 Suppl. 183–91.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.