E. Forestier

38 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers

E. Forestier
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 34
  • Emergency Medical Services 39
  • Microbiology 32
  • Pharmacology 79
  • Molecular Medicine 23
Replace Annette Schuermans with:
Annette Schuermans Belgium
Kate McCarthy Australia
Monica K Sikka United States
Gary R. Kravitz United States
Frédérique Bouchand France
Hassen Dammak Tunisia
Luis Molinos Spain
Duc B. Nguyen United States
Ana Hornero Spain
R.B.S. Laing United Kingdom
E. Forestier relative to Annette Schuermans Belgium Annette Schuermans's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Annette Schuermans · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Forestier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Forestier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Forestier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Forestier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Forestier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Forestier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Forestier. The network helps show where E. Forestier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Forestier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Forestier Line = papers co-authored together E. Forestier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202066
2 201439
3 202033
4 201633
5 201629
6 201625
7 201824
8 201221
9 202021
10 201620
11 201418
12 200716
13 201715
14 200814
15 201613
16 200612
17 202111
18 202010
19 200710
20 201810

About E. Forestier

E. Forestier is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Surgery, Epidemiology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 42 papers that have together received 504 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (6 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (6 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (5 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (4 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (3 papers) and Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (34 citations), Emergency Medical Services (39 citations), Microbiology (32 citations), Pharmacology (79 citations) and Molecular Medicine (23 citations). E. Forestier has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Claire Roubaud‐Baudron, T. Fraisse, G. Gavazzi, Tristan Ferry, Marc Paccalin, J. Gaillat, O. Lesens, Léonardo Pagani, Sébastien Lustıg and Frédéric Laurent. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Medicine, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Age and Ageing and Archives of cardiovascular diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact