E. F. Pearson

1.3k citations
32 papers · 991 · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

E. F. Pearson

32 papers receiving 934 citations

Peers

E. F. Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Spectroscopy 550
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 614
  • Atmospheric Science 234
  • Inorganic Chemistry 154
  • Archeology 61
Replace David P. Baldwin with:
David P. Baldwin United States
Mohammed Bahou Taiwan
George Burns Canada
Brian W. Ticknor United States
Osman Sorkhabi United States
Gianfranco Di Lonardo Italy
P. Natalis Belgium
Hiroko Suzuki Japan
David A. Weil United States
A. Hinchliffe United Kingdom
E. F. Pearson relative to David P. Baldwin United States David P. Baldwin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
David P. Baldwin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. F. Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. F. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. F. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. F. Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. F. Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. F. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. F. Pearson. The network helps show where E. F. Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside E. F. Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. F. Pearson Line = papers co-authored together E. F. Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976114
2 197268
3 197359
4 197649
5 196948
6 197247
7 196947
8 197347
9 197336
10 197435
11 197035
12 197329
13 196628
14 197828
15 197227
16 198426
17 197925
18 197023
19 197223
20 197322

About E. F. Pearson

E. F. Pearson is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Atmospheric Science, Archeology and Conservation, having authored 32 papers that have together received 991 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (21 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (12 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (10 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (10 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (3 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (3 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (2 papers) and Forensic and Genetic Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (550 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (614 citations), Atmospheric Science (234 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (154 citations) and Archeology (61 citations). E. F. Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Walter Gordy, R. A. Creswell, G. Winnewisser, Manfred Winnewisser, Hyunyong Kim, C. L. Norris, W. H. Flygare, C.A. Pounds, Max B. Trueblood and Evan H. Appelman. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Chemical Physics Letters, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Forensic Science International and The Astrophysical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact