E. Días is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Clinical Biochemistry.
According to data from OpenAlex, E. Días has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 383 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Epidemiology, 1 paper in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 1 paper in Clinical Biochemistry. Recurrent topics in E. Días's work include Trypanosoma species research and implications (7 papers), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (1 paper) and Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (1 paper). E. Días is often cited by papers focused on Trypanosoma species research and implications (7 papers), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (1 paper) and Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (1 paper). E. Días collaborates with scholars based in Brazil. E. Días's co-authors include F. S. Laranja and Andreia Machado Miranda and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation and PubMed.
In The Last Decade
E. Días
6 papers
receiving
336 citations
Hit Papers
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Chagas' Disease
1956376 citationsF. S. Laranja, E. Días et al.Circulationprofile →
Citations per year, relative to E. Días E. Días (= 1×)
peers
F. S. Laranja
Countries citing papers authored by E. Días
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Días's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Días with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Días more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Días. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Días. The network helps show where E. Días may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Días
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Días.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Días based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E. Días. E. Días is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Días, E.. (2010). [Chagas' disease, a major public health problem].. PubMed. 61(14-15). 162–4.
3.
Días, E., et al.. (1956). [Climatic aspects of Chagas' disease. I. Notes on the geographical distribution of Triatoma infestans].. PubMed. 8(4). 633–41.1 indexed citations
4.
Laranja, F. S., et al.. (1956). Chagas' Disease. Circulation. 14(6). 1035–1060.376 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Días, E.. (1953). [Chagas disease in the Americas. VII. Chile].. PubMed. 5(2). 131–6.1 indexed citations
6.
Días, E.. (1952). [Chagas' disease in the Americas. IV. Colombia, Venezuela and the Guianas].. PubMed. 4(3). 255–80.2 indexed citations
7.
Días, E., et al.. (1952). [Survey on Chagas' disease in the localities of Pedra Blanca and Sertaozinho, municipality of Bambui, Minas Gerais].. PubMed. 4(3). 227–30.1 indexed citations
8.
Días, E., et al.. (1951). [Clinical aspect and treatment of Chagas' disease].. PubMed. 38(9). 465–84.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.