E. C. Simpson

2.8k total citations
63 papers, 815 citations indexed

About

E. C. Simpson is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, E. C. Simpson has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 815 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 58 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 28 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 16 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in E. C. Simpson's work include Nuclear physics research studies (56 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (42 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (26 papers). E. C. Simpson is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (56 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (42 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (26 papers). E. C. Simpson collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. E. C. Simpson's co-authors include J. A. Tostevin, M. Dasgupta, D. J. Hinde, K. J. Cook, C. Simenel, K. Vo-Phuoc, D. H. Luong, E. Williams, M. Wiescher and P. J. LeBlanc and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

E. C. Simpson

57 papers receiving 790 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
E. C. Simpson Australia	18	773	333	253	127	61	63	815
T. N. Ginter United States	18	945 1.2×	366 1.1×	349 1.4×	156 1.2×	53 0.9×	45	1.0k
L. Gaudefroy France	13	554 0.7×	230 0.7×	200 0.8×	74 0.6×	73 1.2×	35	586
A. Spyrou United States	20	1.0k 1.3×	408 1.2×	464 1.8×	203 1.6×	116 1.9×	89	1.1k
T. K. Ghosh India	17	522 0.7×	214 0.6×	188 0.7×	143 1.1×	43 0.7×	66	620
M. Notani Japan	18	919 1.2×	414 1.2×	365 1.4×	148 1.2×	61 1.0×	44	967
C. R. Hoffman United States	19	950 1.2×	429 1.3×	336 1.3×	88 0.7×	137 2.2×	90	990
C.G. Sheu United States	5	733 0.9×	360 1.1×	169 0.7×	58 0.5×	94 1.5×	6	787
A. Obertelli France	19	945 1.2×	422 1.3×	386 1.5×	143 1.1×	108 1.8×	59	986
V.-V. Elomaa Finland	20	903 1.2×	356 1.1×	307 1.2×	61 0.5×	90 1.5×	42	995
G. Christian United States	13	518 0.7×	266 0.8×	214 0.8×	59 0.5×	72 1.2×	37	566

Countries citing papers authored by E. C. Simpson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. C. Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. C. Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. C. Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. C. Simpson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. C. Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. C. Simpson. The network helps show where E. C. Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. C. Simpson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. C. Simpson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. C. Simpson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. C. Simpson. E. C. Simpson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Dasgupta, M., et al.. (2025). Enhancing heavy ion accelerator capabilities in Australia. Nuclear Physics A. 1058. 123036–123036.

Cook, K. J., E. C. Simpson, D. C. Rafferty, et al.. (2025). Quantitatively relating multinucleon transfer and fusion. Physics Letters B. 865. 139465–139465.

Simpson, E. C., et al.. (2025). Observation of suppression of heavy-ion fusion by slow quasifission. Nuclear Physics A. 1063. 123198–123198.

Hinde, D. J., K. J. Cook, M. Dasgupta, et al.. (2025). Universality of shell effects in fusion-fission mass distributions. Physics Letters B. 865. 139459–139459.

Simpson, E. C., et al.. (2024). Observation of suppression of heavy-ion fusion by slow quasifission. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 306. 1029–1029. 2 indexed citations

Bolst, David, et al.. (2024). VALIDATION OF THE LIGHT ION QMD MODEL FOR 12C ION THERAPY IN GEANT4. International Journal of Particle Therapy. 12. 100618–100618.

Tanaka, T., D. J. Hinde, M. Dasgupta, et al.. (2023). Competition between fusion and quasifission in the angular momentum dependent dynamics of heavy element synthesis reactions. Physical review. C. 107(5). 4 indexed citations

Berriman, A. C., D. J. Hinde, D. Y. Jeung, et al.. (2022). Energy dependence of p+Th232 fission mass distributions: Mass-asymmetric standard I and standard II modes, and multichance fission. Physical review. C. 105(6). 9 indexed citations

Sakata, D., et al.. (2022). Development of a more accurate Geant4 quantum molecular dynamics model for hadron therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 67(22). 225001–225001. 3 indexed citations

10.

Jeung, D. Y., D. J. Hinde, E. Williams, et al.. (2021). Energy dissipation and suppression of capture cross sections in heavy ion reactions. Physical review. C. 103(3). 7 indexed citations

11.

Cook, K. J., T. K. Eriksen, E. C. Simpson, et al.. (2021). High-precision proton angular distribution measurements of C12(p,p′) for the determination of the E0 decay branching ratio of the Hoyle state. Physical review. C. 104(2). 2 indexed citations

12.

Longfellow, B., A. Gade, J. A. Tostevin, et al.. (2020). Two-neutron knockout as a probe of the composition of states in Mg22,Al23, and Si24. Physical review. C. 101(3). 10 indexed citations

13.

Stoyer, M. A., A. C. Berriman, D. J. Hinde, et al.. (2020). Mass-asymmetric fission of Bi205,207,209 at energies close to the fission barrier using proton bombardment of Pb204,206,208. Physical review. C. 102(5). 20 indexed citations

14.

Cook, K. J., E. C. Simpson, M. Dasgupta, et al.. (2019). Origins of Incomplete Fusion Products and the Suppression of Complete Fusion in Reactions of Li7. Physical Review Letters. 122(10). 102501–102501. 40 indexed citations

15.

Morjean, M., D. J. Hinde, C. Simenel, et al.. (2017). Evidence for the Role of Proton Shell Closure in Quasifission Reactions from X-Ray Fluorescence of Mass-Identified Fragments. Physical Review Letters. 119(22). 222502–222502. 20 indexed citations

16.

Simpson, E. C.. (2016). Production of the PET isotope 11 C in hadron therapy via neutron knockout. Physica Medica. 32(12). 1813–1818.

17.

Hinde, D. J., E. Williams, G. Mohanto, et al.. (2016). Nuclear structure effects in quasifission – understanding the formation of the heaviest elements. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 123. 3005–3005. 2 indexed citations

18.

Simpson, E. C., P. Navrátil, Robert Roth, & J. A. Tostevin. (2012). Microscopic two-nucleon overlaps and knockout reactions from12C. Physical Review C. 86(5). 4 indexed citations

19.

Simpson, E. C., J. A. Tostevin, D. Bazin, B. A. Brown, & A. Gade. (2009). Two-Nucleon Knockout Spectroscopy at the Limits of Nuclear Stability. Physical Review Letters. 102(13). 132502–132502. 28 indexed citations

20.

Wiescher, M., R.E. Azuma, L. R. Gasques, et al.. (2006). Charged particle reaction rates from stellar H to C burning.. MmSAI. 77. 910. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact