Е. Амбросиони
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Nutrition and Dietetics
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Claudio BorghiFrancesco Vittorio CostaSilvia BoschiB MagnaniStefano BacchelliMaddalena VeronesiDaniela Degli EspostiEugenio Roberto Cosentino
- Topics
- Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (4 papers)Sodium Intake and Health (3 papers)Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Е. Амбросиони
9 papers receiving 207 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 151
- Behavioral Neuroscience 69
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 31
- Nutrition and Dietetics 21
- Surgery 20
Countries citing papers authored by Е. Амбросиони
This map shows the geographic impact of Е. Амбросиони's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Е. Амбросиони with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Е. Амбросиони more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Е. Амбросиони
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Е. Амбросиони. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Е. Амбросиони. The network helps show where Е. Амбросиони may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Е. Амбросиони
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Е. Амбросиони. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Е. Амбросиони based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Е. Амбросиони. Е. Амбросиони is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | [Significance of the degree of oxidative hepatic metabolism in conditioning the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of propafenone]. | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of enalapril plus hydrochlorothiazide plus methyldopa vs standard triple therapy in the treatment of moderate to severe hypertension: results from a multicentre study. | 7 |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 133 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | Comparison of antihypertensive activity and tolerability of guanfacine and methyldopa. | 1 |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | Side effects of antihypertensive drugs. Incidence and methods of collection. | 14 |
About Е. Амбросиони
Е. Амбросиони is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics and Electrochemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 227 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (4 papers), Sodium Intake and Health (3 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (69 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (151 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (16 citations). Е. Амбросиони has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Spain and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Claudio Borghi, Francesco Vittorio Costa, Silvia Boschi, B Magnani, Stefano Bacchelli, Maddalena Veronesi, Daniela Degli Esposti, Eugenio Roberto Cosentino, Lucio Montebugnoli and B Magnani. Their work appears in journals such as Drugs, Journal of Hypertension and Pharmacological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.