Dylan Stavish
Impact in
-
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Renal and related cancers
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Congenital heart defects research
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 8
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 6
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation 2
- Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics 1
- Genetics 2
- Animal Genetics and Reproduction 2
- Co-authors
- Ivana Barbaric (7 shared papers)Peter W. Andrews (5 shared papers)Paul J. Gokhale (4 shared papers)Mark Jones (2 shared papers)Veronica Biga (2 shared papers)Daniel Coca (2 shared papers)Christopher J. Price (3 shared papers)Thomas J.R. Frith (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Stem Cell Reports (4 papers)Developmental Cell (1 paper)eLife (1 paper)Current Protocols (1 paper)Nature Communications (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Dylan Stavish
9 papers receiving 267 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Developmental Neuroscience 15
- Molecular Biology 239
- Cell Biology 44
- Biophysics 13
- Aging 3
Countries citing papers authored by Dylan Stavish
This map shows the geographic impact of Dylan Stavish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dylan Stavish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dylan Stavish more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dylan Stavish
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dylan Stavish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dylan Stavish. The network helps show where Dylan Stavish may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dylan Stavish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 68 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 6 |
About Dylan Stavish
Dylan Stavish is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cell Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Plant Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (8 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (6 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (2 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (2 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (1 paper), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (1 paper) and Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (15 citations), Molecular Biology (239 citations), Cell Biology (44 citations), Biophysics (13 citations) and Aging (3 citations). Dylan Stavish has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ivana Barbaric, Peter W. Andrews, Paul J. Gokhale, Mark Jones, Veronica Biga, Daniel Coca, Christopher J. Price, Thomas J.R. Frith, Adam Glen and Tristan A. Rodríguez. Their work appears in journals such as Stem Cell Reports, Developmental Cell, eLife, Current Protocols and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.