Duke Appiah

1.8k citations
81 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 18

Duke Appiah

73 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Duke Appiah
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Reproductive Medicine 153
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 131
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 241
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 319
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 238
Replace Nicola J. Adderley with:
Nicola J. Adderley United Kingdom
Marie-Louise Bartelink Netherlands
Anuradhaa Subramanian United Kingdom
Gaëlle Gusto France
Eleni Armeni Greece
Frédéric‐Simon Hould Canada
Fatma Demirel Türkiye
Rachel Crowley Ireland
Rainer Wunsch Germany
Terrence K. Allen United States
Duke Appiah relative to Nicola J. Adderley United Kingdom Nicola J. Adderley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.5×
Nicola J. Adderley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Duke Appiah

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Duke Appiah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Duke Appiah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Duke Appiah more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Duke Appiah

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Duke Appiah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Duke Appiah. The network helps show where Duke Appiah may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Duke Appiah, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Duke Appiah Line = papers co-authored together Duke Appiah links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20251
3 20251
4 20244
5 20241
6 20240
7 20240
8 20241
9 20239
10 20236
11 202314
12 202310
13 20223
14 202110
15 20218
16 202012
17 201925
18 201747
19 201671
20 201539

About Duke Appiah

Duke Appiah is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Reproductive Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity (12 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (9 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (8 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (7 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (6 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (6 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors (6 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (153 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (131 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (241 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (319 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (238 citations). Duke Appiah has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Nigeria and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Pamela J. Schreiner, Stephen J. Winters, Imo Ebong, Aaron R. Folsom, Chike C. Nwabuo, Melissa Wellons, Cora E. Lewis, Carlton A. Hornung, Ellen W. Demerath and João A.C. Lima. Their work appears in journals such as Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society, Journal of the American Heart Association, Circulation, Annals of Epidemiology and Diabetes Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026