Drew Parker
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 1%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ragini VermaRuben C. GurRaquel E. GurTheodore D. SatterthwaiteKosha RuparelMadhura IngalhalikarBirkan TunçAlexander C.W. Smith
- Topics
- Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (28 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (20 papers)Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaFrance
In The Last Decade
Drew Parker
47 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.0k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.0k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 237
- Psychiatry and Mental health 225
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 215
Countries citing papers authored by Drew Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of Drew Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Drew Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Drew Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Drew Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Drew Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Drew Parker. The network helps show where Drew Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Drew Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Drew Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Drew Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Drew Parker. Drew Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | Harmonization of multi-site diffusion tensor imaging databreakdown → | 653 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 46 | |
| 17 | 97 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Socialization of Distance Education: The Web as Enabler. | 1 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Drew Parker
Drew Parker is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 49 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (28 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (20 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.0k citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (88 citations). Drew Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Ragini Verma, Ruben C. Gur, Raquel E. Gur, Theodore D. Satterthwaite, Kosha Ruparel, Madhura Ingalhalikar, Birkan Tunç, Alexander C.W. Smith, Håkon Håkonarson and Mark A. Elliott. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, JAMA and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.