Douglas D. Cook

1.9k total citations
44 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Douglas D. Cook is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Douglas D. Cook has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 16 papers in Plant Science and 11 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Douglas D. Cook's work include Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (25 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (10 papers) and Bioenergy crop production and management (8 papers). Douglas D. Cook is often cited by papers focused on Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (25 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (10 papers) and Bioenergy crop production and management (8 papers). Douglas D. Cook collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Arab Emirates and Canada. Douglas D. Cook's co-authors include Daniel J. Robertson, Margaret Julias, Shien Yang Lee, Christopher J. Stubbs, Luc Mongeau, W. Sun, Eric A. Nauman, Brian Gardunia, Karl J. Niklas and Loay Al‐Zube and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Journal of Experimental Botany.

In The Last Decade

Douglas D. Cook

41 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Douglas D. Cook United States	23	658	513	248	182	120	44	1.2k
Ola Lindroos Sweden	23	268 0.4×	137 0.3×	173 0.7×	29 0.2×	20 0.2×	87	1.4k
Frank Hesse Germany	8	84 0.1×	161 0.3×	54 0.2×	334 1.8×	11 0.1×	15	629
Honglei Jia China	17	54 0.1×	147 0.3×	309 1.2×	177 1.0×	15 0.1×	65	807
Juan Prado-Olivarez Mexico	11	44 0.1×	373 0.7×	37 0.1×	47 0.3×	18 0.1×	43	762
Athanasios Papaioannou Greece	17	22 0.0×	138 0.3×	13 0.1×	94 0.5×	5 0.0×	54	1.4k
Tianyi Wang China	18	23 0.0×	302 0.6×	113 0.5×	29 0.2×	11 0.1×	84	1.0k
Jìngyuàn Zhāng China	15	137 0.2×	30 0.1×	80 0.3×	60 0.3×	17 0.1×	43	744
Qingxi Liao China	13	63 0.1×	264 0.5×	211 0.9×	71 0.4×		56	674
Minghui Cheng China	10	69 0.1×	226 0.4×	276 1.1×	228 1.3×		25	696
Andrew Guzzomi Australia	16	44 0.1×	269 0.5×	243 1.0×	47 0.3×	2 0.0×	56	653

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas D. Cook

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas D. Cook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas D. Cook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas D. Cook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas D. Cook

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas D. Cook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas D. Cook. The network helps show where Douglas D. Cook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas D. Cook

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas D. Cook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas D. Cook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas D. Cook. Douglas D. Cook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Cook, Douglas D., et al.. (2024). Effects of the Leaf Sheath on Stalk Strength in Maize. 98–101.

Cook, Douglas D., et al.. (2024). Measurement of maize stalk shear moduli. Plant Methods. 20(1). 152–152.

Kumar, Rohit, Christopher J. Stubbs, William C. Bridges, et al.. (2023). Unveiling the phenotypic landscape of stalk lodging resistance in diverse maize hybrids. Field Crops Research. 304. 109168–109168. 6 indexed citations

Sutherland, Brandon R., et al.. (2023). The influence of water content on the longitudinal modulus of elasticity of maize stalk pith and rind tissues. Plant Methods. 19(1). 64–64. 4 indexed citations

Tanner, Herbert G., et al.. (2022). Multiple brace root phenotypes promote anchorage and limit root lodging in maize. Plant Cell & Environment. 45(5). 1573–1583. 26 indexed citations

Stevens, Kimberly A., Jeffrey Tithof, Douglas D. Cook, John H. Thomas, & Douglas H. Kelley. (2022). Sensitivity analysis on a network model of glymphatic flow. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 19(191). 20220257–20220257. 20 indexed citations

Kumar, Rohit, Christopher Saski, Daniel J. Robertson, et al.. (2021). Genetic Architecture of Maize Rind Strength Revealed by the Analysis of Divergently Selected Populations. Plant and Cell Physiology. 62(7). 1199–1214. 13 indexed citations

Sutherland, Brandon R., et al.. (2021). Axial variation in flexural stiffness of plant stem segments: measurement methods and the influence of measurement uncertainty. Plant Methods. 17(1). 101–101. 5 indexed citations

Weldekidan, Teclemariam, et al.. (2020). Maize brace roots provide stalk anchorage. Plant Direct. 4(11). e00284–e00284. 34 indexed citations

10.

Stubbs, Christopher J., et al.. (2020). Integrated Puncture Score: force–displacement weighted rind penetration tests improve stalk lodging resistance estimations in maize. Plant Methods. 16(1). 113–113. 16 indexed citations

11.

Cook, Douglas D., et al.. (2020). The effect of probe geometry on rind puncture resistance testing of maize stalks. Plant Methods. 16(1). 65–65. 16 indexed citations

12.

Al‐Zube, Loay, W. Sun, Daniel J. Robertson, & Douglas D. Cook. (2018). The elastic modulus for maize stems. Plant Methods. 14(1). 11–11. 60 indexed citations

13.

Stubbs, Christopher J., W. Sun, & Douglas D. Cook. (2018). Measuring the transverse Young’s modulus of maize rind and pith tissues. Journal of Biomechanics. 84. 113–120. 29 indexed citations

14.

Al‐Zube, Loay, et al.. (2017). Measuring the compressive modulus of elasticity of pith-filled plant stems. Plant Methods. 13(1). 99–99. 33 indexed citations

15.

Robertson, Daniel J., Matías Zañartu, & Douglas D. Cook. (2016). Comprehensive, Population-Based Sensitivity Analysis of a Two-Mass Vocal Fold Model. PLoS ONE. 11(2). e0148309–e0148309. 10 indexed citations

16.

Robertson, Daniel J., et al.. (2015). Preventing lodging in bioenergy crops: a biomechanical analysis of maize stalks suggests a new approach. Journal of Experimental Botany. 66(14). 4367–4371. 61 indexed citations

17.

Robertson, Daniel J., et al.. (2014). On measuring the bending strength of septate grass stems. American Journal of Botany. 102(1). 5–11. 51 indexed citations

18.

Cook, Douglas D., Margaret Julias, & Eric A. Nauman. (2014). Biological variability in biomechanical engineering research: Significance and meta-analysis of current modeling practices. Journal of Biomechanics. 47(6). 1241–1250. 37 indexed citations

19.

Robertson, Daniel J. & Douglas D. Cook. (2014). Unrealistic statistics: How average constitutive coefficients can produce non-physical results. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 40. 234–239. 33 indexed citations

20.

Cook, Douglas D.. (2009). Systematic structural analysis of human vocal fold models. Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact