Doug Lin

1.1k total citations
10 papers, 651 citations indexed

About

Doug Lin is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Doug Lin has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 651 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3 papers in Instrumentation and 1 paper in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Doug Lin's work include Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (7 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (5 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (4 papers). Doug Lin is often cited by papers focused on Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (7 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (5 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (4 papers). Doug Lin collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Switzerland. Doug Lin's co-authors include Geoffrey W. Marcy, Jason T. Wright, Jay Anderson, Andrew W. Howard, John Asher Johnson, Howard Isaacson, Debra A. Fischer, Shigeru Ida, Jeff A. Valenti and Huaxin Si and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

Doug Lin

10 papers receiving 620 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Doug Lin United States	9	504	122	90	71	42	10	651
Deborah E. Schwartz United States	11	321 0.6×	53 0.4×	99 1.1×	16 0.2×	19 0.5×	25	502
Lile Wang China	13	381 0.8×	69 0.6×	18 0.2×	16 0.2×	30 0.7×	38	467
Katie Auchettl United States	20	1.1k 2.2×	113 0.9×	50 0.6×	54 0.8×	61 1.5×	55	1.4k
N. A. Walton United Kingdom	17	576 1.1×	200 1.6×	53 0.6×	5 0.1×	29 0.7×	82	736
Élodie Choquet France	15	440 0.9×	183 1.5×	29 0.3×	4 0.1×	30 0.7×	59	622
Michiko Ohkubo Japan	13	371 0.7×	121 1.0×	5 0.1×	373 5.3×	84 2.0×	25	857
Roger E. Cohen United States	18	819 1.6×	427 3.5×	22 0.2×	7 0.1×	19 0.5×	58	896
K. O’Neil United States	19	832 1.7×	451 3.7×	30 0.3×	13 0.2×	78 1.9×	55	1.0k
T. Penz Austria	20	1.2k 2.3×	106 0.9×	4 0.0×	38 0.5×	295 7.0×	45	1.4k
Etsuji Watanabe Japan	13	662 1.3×	198 1.6×	28 0.3×	6 0.1×	405 9.6×	29	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Doug Lin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Doug Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doug Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doug Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Doug Lin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doug Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doug Lin. The network helps show where Doug Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Doug Lin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Doug Lin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Doug Lin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Doug Lin. Doug Lin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Großschedl, Josefa E., J. Alves, N. Miret-Roig, et al.. (2023). The star formation history of the Sco-Cen association. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 678. A71–A71. 50 indexed citations

2.

Dekel, Avishai, Sharon Lapiner, Jonathan Freundlich, et al.. (2020). Origin of star-forming rings around massive centres in massive galaxies at z < 4. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 496(4). 5372–5398. 30 indexed citations

3.

Davies, M. B. & Doug Lin. (2020). Making massive stars in the Galactic Centre via accretion on to low-mass stars within an accretion disc. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 498(3). 3452–3456. 35 indexed citations

4.

Liu, Shang-Fei, Yasunori Hori, Simon Müller, et al.. (2019). The formation of Jupiter’s diluted core by a giant impact. Nature. 572(7769). 355–357. 65 indexed citations

5.

Vorobyov, Eduard I., et al.. (2016). An alternative model for the origin of gaps in circumstellar disks. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 5 indexed citations

6.

Lin, Doug, et al.. (2012). EPISODIC STARBURSTS IN DWARF SPHEROIDAL GALAXIES: A SIMPLE MODEL. The Astrophysical Journal. 748(2). 149–149. 15 indexed citations

7.

Howard, Andrew W., Geoffrey W. Marcy, John Asher Johnson, et al.. (2010). The Occurrence and Mass Distribution of Close-in Super-Earths, Neptunes, and Jupiters. Science. 330(6004). 653–655. 299 indexed citations

8.

Cai, Qiliang, Ke Lan, Subhash C. Verma, et al.. (2006). Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Latent Protein LANA Interacts with HIF-1α To Upregulate RTA Expression during Hypoxia: Latency Control under Low Oxygen Conditions. Journal of Virology. 80(16). 7965–7975. 115 indexed citations

9.

Yorke, H. W., et al.. (1999). Dust Coagulation in Infalling Protostellar Envelopes. I. Compact Grains. The Astrophysical Journal. 524(2). 857–866. 18 indexed citations

10.

Papaloizou, J. C. B., Caroline Terquem, & Doug Lin. (1998). On the Global Warping of a Thin Self‐gravitating Near‐Keplerian Gaseous Disk with Application to the Disk in NGC 4258. The Astrophysical Journal. 497(1). 212–226. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact