Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Complications of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
This map shows the geographic impact of Dotter Ct's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dotter Ct with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dotter Ct more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dotter Ct. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dotter Ct. The network helps show where Dotter Ct may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dotter Ct
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dotter Ct.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dotter Ct based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dotter Ct. Dotter Ct is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rösch, Josef, et al.. (1986). Interventional angiography in the diagnosis of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.. PubMed. 6(2). 136–41.14 indexed citations
Rösch, Josef, Ruza Antonovic, Martin L. Goldman, & Dotter Ct. (1975). Epinephrine renal venography*. RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. 123(12). 501–515.4 indexed citations
11.
Ct, Dotter. (1974). Catheter technics in diagnosing and treating femoral artery atherosclerosis.. PubMed. 29(3). 93–5 passim.1 indexed citations
12.
Ct, Dotter. (1971). Clinical indications for transluminal dilatation in the management of atheromatous leg ischemia.. PubMed. 3(1). 103–11.
13.
Ct, Dotter, et al.. (1969). Transluminal angioplasty in arteriosclerotic obstruction of the lower extremities.. PubMed. 97(7). 95–108.4 indexed citations
14.
Ct, Dotter, et al.. (1967). Nonoperative treatment of arterial occlusive disease: a radiologically facilitated technique.. PubMed. 5(3). 531–42.12 indexed citations
15.
Ct, Dotter, et al.. (1965). ANGIOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS OF INTRAHEPATIC RUPTURE SECONDARY TO BLUNT TRAUMA.. PubMed. 64. 577–9.1 indexed citations
16.
Steinberg, Israel, et al.. (1964). ROENTGEN FEATURES OF THREATENING THORACIC AORTIC RUPTURE. REPORT OF 4 CASES.. PubMed. 91. 1288–94.3 indexed citations
17.
Ct, Dotter, et al.. (1963). Iothalamate (Conray, Angio-Conray), a new cardiovascular contrast agent of low toxicity, low viscosity and high opacity.. PubMed. 4. 400–2.1 indexed citations
18.
Starr, Albert, Victor Menashe, & Dotter Ct. (1960). Surgical correction of aortic insufficiency associated with ventricular septal defect.. PubMed. 111. 71–6.51 indexed citations
19.
Ct, Dotter, et al.. (1953). Tricuspid insufficiency; observations based on angiocardiography and cardiac catheterization in twelve patients.. PubMed. 70(5). 786–92.8 indexed citations
20.
Ct, Dotter, et al.. (1951). Superior vena cava and innominate veins; angiocardiographic study.. PubMed. 66(3). 341–52.28 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.