Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Potassium-argon dates and the Cenozoic mammalian chronology of North America
1964390 citationsJack F. Evernden, Donald E. Savage et al.American Journal of Scienceprofile →
The Potassium-Argon Dating of Late Cenozoic Rocks in East Africa and Italy [and Comments and Reply]
1965152 citationsJack F. Evernden, Garniss H. Curtis et al.Current Anthropologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Donald E. Savage
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Donald E. Savage's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald E. Savage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald E. Savage more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donald E. Savage
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald E. Savage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald E. Savage. The network helps show where Donald E. Savage may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald E. Savage
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald E. Savage.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald E. Savage based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Donald E. Savage. Donald E. Savage is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Russell, Donald E., Pierre Louis, & Donald E. Savage. (1973). Chiroptera and Dermoptera of the French early Eocene. Medical Entomology and Zoology.36 indexed citations
Russell, Donald E., Pierre Louis, & Donald E. Savage. (1967). Primates of the French early Eocene. University of California Press eBooks.44 indexed citations
12.
Camp, Charles L., et al.. (1967). Ruben Arthur Stirton. Journal of Mammalogy.2 indexed citations
13.
Savage, Donald E., Donald E. Russell, & Pierre Louis. (1966). Ceratomorpha and Ancylopoda (Perissodactyla) from the lower Eocene, Paris Basin, France. Medical Entomology and Zoology.18 indexed citations
14.
Savage, Donald E., Donald E. Russell, & Pierre Louis. (1965). European Eocene Equidae (Perissodactyla). University of California Press eBooks.30 indexed citations
15.
Evernden, Jack F., Garniss H. Curtis, William Bishop, et al.. (1965). The Potassium-Argon Dating of Late Cenozoic Rocks in East Africa and Italy [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology. 6(4). 342–385.152 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Evernden, Jack F., et al.. (1964). Potassium-argon dates and the Cenozoic mammalian chronology of North America. American Journal of Science. 262(2). 145–198.390 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Curtis, Garniss H., Donald E. Savage, & Jack F. Evernden. (1961). CRITICAL POINTS IN THE CENOZOIC. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 91(2). 342–346.9 indexed citations
18.
Savage, Donald E.. (1960). A survey of various late Cenozoic vertebrate faunas of the Panhandle of Texas. University of California Press eBooks.45 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.