Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Digital transformation challenges: strategies emerging from a multi-stakeholder approach
2020270 citationsDominik T. Matt, Angelo Bonfanti et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Dominik T. Matt
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Dominik T. Matt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dominik T. Matt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dominik T. Matt more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dominik T. Matt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dominik T. Matt. The network helps show where Dominik T. Matt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dominik T. Matt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dominik T. Matt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dominik T. Matt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dominik T. Matt. Dominik T. Matt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Matt, Dominik T., Michael Riedl, & Erwin Rauch. (2020). Die Natur als Inspiration. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb. 115(3). 158–161.3 indexed citations
7.
Matt, Dominik T., et al.. (2019). Roadmap in eine Digitale Welt. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb. 114(9). 576–579.2 indexed citations
8.
Rauch, Erwin, et al.. (2019). Eye Tracking in der Produktion 4.0. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb. 114(1-2). 72–75.2 indexed citations
9.
Rauch, Erwin, Rafael A. Rojas, Patrick Dallasega, & Dominik T. Matt. (2018). Smart Shopfloor Management. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb. 113(1-2). 17–21.8 indexed citations
Matt, Dominik T., et al.. (2016). Smart Factory für den Mittelstand. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb. 111(1-2). 52–55.10 indexed citations
13.
Matt, Dominik T., Erwin Rauch, Patrick Dallasega, Renato Vidoni, & Pasquale Russo Spena. (2015). Synchronisierung von ETO-Fertigung und Baustellenmontage. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb. 110(1-2). 9–13.1 indexed citations
14.
Matt, Dominik T., Erwin Rauch, & Patrick Dallasega. (2014). Knowledge work and knowledge management in small and medium sized engineer-to-order enterprises. View. 316–321.1 indexed citations
Matt, Dominik T.. (2007). Den Kundennutzen im Visier. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb. 102(6). 375–379.1 indexed citations
17.
Matt, Dominik T.. (2006). Fast Configuration of Lean and Customer Driven Production Systems with Axiomatic Designed Production Module Templates. View. 52. 373–378.6 indexed citations
Matt, Dominik T.. (2001). Die „Produktionslandkarte“. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb. 96(6). 328–331.1 indexed citations
20.
Späth, Dieter, et al.. (1998). The Communication Circle. A model for the support of a market-driven development and production of innovative products. View.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.