This map shows the geographic impact of DJ Cottle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by DJ Cottle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites DJ Cottle more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by DJ Cottle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by DJ Cottle. The network helps show where DJ Cottle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of DJ Cottle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of DJ Cottle.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of DJ Cottle based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with DJ Cottle. DJ Cottle is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cottle, DJ, et al.. (2009). Product-process groups and wool price.. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 47(1).1 indexed citations
5.
Cottle, DJ. (2003). Sheep and wool science education in Australian universities. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 51(4).1 indexed citations
6.
Cottle, DJ, et al.. (1998). The use of midside fleece fibre diameter distribution measurements in sheep selection.. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 46(2).5 indexed citations
7.
Cottle, DJ, et al.. (1996). Precision of OFDA fibre diameter measurements of midside wool samples.. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 44(4).1 indexed citations
8.
Atkins, KD, et al.. (1995). Merino central test sire evaluation: medium wool (1989-1993) and fine wool (1990-1993).. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 43(1).3 indexed citations
9.
Cottle, DJ. (1995). Wooltech Merinos: a resource flock using elite link sires.. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 43(1).1 indexed citations
10.
Cottle, DJ. (1994). Effects of clip preparation practices on lot size and raw wool characteristics of growers\' lines.. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 42(2).2 indexed citations
11.
Cottle, DJ, et al.. (1993). Sampling variance in sale lots and its influence on test prediction.. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 41(2).1 indexed citations
12.
Cottle, DJ, et al.. (1993). Merino sheep evaluation central test results 1987-1991.. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 41(1).
13.
Cottle, DJ, et al.. (1993). A Review of the Use of Sheep Coats to Improve the Processing Potential of Wool. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 41(2).5 indexed citations
14.
Cottle, DJ, J Eppleston, & Emma Roberts. (1991). Fleece traits to be considered in Merino sire evaluation schemes.. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 39(2). 88–90.1 indexed citations
15.
Atkins, KD, et al.. (1991). A national sire evaluation programme.. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 39(1).3 indexed citations
16.
Cottle, DJ, et al.. (1990). Perspectives on Merino wool producers' problems in satisfying processors' raw material specifications.. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 38. 114–118.2 indexed citations
17.
Cottle, DJ & B. G. Wilkinson. (1989). Information from New Zealand and Australian Merino wether trials.. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 37(3).
Cottle, DJ. (1987). Fleece weight:fibre diameter ratios and sheep selection.. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 35(3).5 indexed citations
20.
Cottle, DJ. (1986). Wool properties of housed superfine Merino wethers fed grain, lucerne chaff and mixed rations.. Wool technology and sheep breeding. 34(4).5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.