Diele Lôbo

411 total citations
9 papers, 287 citations indexed

About

Diele Lôbo is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Diele Lôbo has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 287 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 2 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Diele Lôbo's work include Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (2 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers). Diele Lôbo is often cited by papers focused on Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (2 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers). Diele Lôbo collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Australia. Diele Lôbo's co-authors include Marcelo Tabarelli, Tarciso C. C. Leão, Felipe P. L. Melo, André Maurício Melo Santos, Inara R. Leal, Lorraine Scotson, Alexandre Ardichvili, Sílvia Pereira de Castro Casa Nova, Harold N. Eyster and Andrew Wright and has published in prestigious journals such as Conservation Biology, Ecological Economics and Biological Conservation.

In The Last Decade

Diele Lôbo

8 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Diele Lôbo United States 5 182 139 102 52 42 9 287
Manette E. Sandor United States 8 171 0.9× 124 0.9× 73 0.7× 102 2.0× 55 1.3× 12 281
Gabriel Damasco Brazil 10 169 0.9× 164 1.2× 91 0.9× 61 1.2× 29 0.7× 14 327
Bezeng S. Bezeng South Africa 9 159 0.9× 123 0.9× 62 0.6× 95 1.8× 94 2.2× 11 317
Daniel Roberto Pérez Argentina 12 100 0.5× 98 0.7× 175 1.7× 76 1.5× 61 1.5× 38 360
Renata Dias Françoso Brazil 6 164 0.9× 153 1.1× 148 1.5× 129 2.5× 82 2.0× 14 435
Alicia Valdés Sweden 10 164 0.9× 125 0.9× 74 0.7× 65 1.3× 66 1.6× 27 272
Cleusa Vogel Ely Brazil 7 94 0.5× 113 0.8× 42 0.4× 65 1.3× 33 0.8× 15 241
Susan Aragón Brazil 11 101 0.6× 127 0.9× 72 0.7× 91 1.8× 22 0.5× 22 280
Ingmar R. Staude Germany 8 121 0.7× 103 0.7× 63 0.6× 70 1.3× 90 2.1× 16 261
Michaele S. Pessoa Brazil 10 274 1.5× 191 1.4× 184 1.8× 138 2.7× 73 1.7× 13 433

Countries citing papers authored by Diele Lôbo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diele Lôbo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diele Lôbo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diele Lôbo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diele Lôbo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diele Lôbo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diele Lôbo. The network helps show where Diele Lôbo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diele Lôbo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diele Lôbo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diele Lôbo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diele Lôbo. Diele Lôbo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Lôbo, Diele, et al.. (2024). A framework for promoting disciplinary diversity and inclusion through epistemic justice. Conservation Biology. 38(6). e14409–e14409. 3 indexed citations
2.
Eyster, Harold N., Diele Lôbo, Andrew Wright, et al.. (2024). Enhancing disciplinary diversity and inclusion in conservation science and practice based on a case study of the Society for Conservation Biology. Conservation Biology. 38(6). e14395–e14395. 3 indexed citations
3.
Lôbo, Diele, et al.. (2023). What does caring HRD look like in practice? A case study of two social enterprises in Brazil. Human Resource Development International. 26(5). 500–520.
4.
Lôbo, Diele, Peter B. Reich, & Alexandre Ardichvili. (2023). Conservation entrepreneurship: A new frontier in conservation science. Biological Conservation. 282. 110078–110078. 1 indexed citations
5.
Lôbo, Diele, et al.. (2022). Five Practices for Building Local Capacity in Sustainability-Driven Entrepreneurship for Place-Based Transformations. Sustainability. 14(5). 3027–3027. 5 indexed citations
6.
Leão, Tarciso C. C., Diele Lôbo, & Lorraine Scotson. (2017). Economic and Biological Conditions Influence the Sustainability of Harvest of Wild Animals and Plants in Developing Countries. Ecological Economics. 140. 14–21. 16 indexed citations
7.
Lôbo, Diele, Tarciso C. C. Leão, Felipe P. L. Melo, André Maurício Melo Santos, & Marcelo Tabarelli. (2011). Forest fragmentation drives Atlantic forest of northeastern Brazil to biotic homogenization. Diversity and Distributions. 17(2). 287–296. 236 indexed citations
8.
Lôbo, Diele, Marcelo Tabarelli, & Inara R. Leal. (2011). Relocation of Croton sonderianus (Euphorbiaceae) seeds by Pheidole fallax Mayr (Formicidae): a case of post-dispersal seed protection by ants?. Neotropical Entomology. 40(4). 440–444. 19 indexed citations
9.
Alves-Costa, Cecília P., Diele Lôbo, Tarciso C. C. Leão, et al.. (2008). Implementando reflorestamentos com alta diversidade na Zona da Mata Nordestina: guia prático. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026