Diana Pasterfield

580 total citations
15 papers, 440 citations indexed

About

Diana Pasterfield is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana Pasterfield has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 440 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Diana Pasterfield's work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers) and Reproductive Health and Contraception (3 papers). Diana Pasterfield is often cited by papers focused on Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers) and Reproductive Health and Contraception (3 papers). Diana Pasterfield collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Diana Pasterfield's co-authors include Maggie Hendry, Clare Wilkinson, Ben Carter, Ruth Lewis, Richard D Neal, Joanna M Charles, Jo Rycroft‐Malone, Rhiannon Whitaker, Nefyn Williams and Noel Craine and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and British Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Diana Pasterfield

15 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Diana Pasterfield

GHP

PHEOH

PPCH

ONCOL

Anke‐Christine Saß Germany

Peter Baker United Kingdom

Péter Balázs Hungary

Seyed Ali Azin Iran

Azita Noroozi Iran

Isabelle Grémy France

Kevin English United States

Gabriel A. Benavidez United States

RH Glazier Canada

Oya Kavlak Türkiye

Anke‐Christine Saß Germany

Diana Pasterfield

281 ×1.4

GHP

139 ×0.7

PHEOH

89 ×1.0

33 ×0.6

PPCH

89 ×1.5

ONCOL

Citations per year, relative to Diana Pasterfield Diana Pasterfield (= 1×) peers Anke‐Christine Saß

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Pasterfield

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Pasterfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Pasterfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Pasterfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Pasterfield

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Pasterfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Pasterfield. The network helps show where Diana Pasterfield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Pasterfield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Pasterfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Pasterfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Pasterfield. Diana Pasterfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

Hendry, Maggie, Diana Pasterfield, Simon Gollins, et al.. (2017). Talking about human papillomavirus and cancer: development of consultation guides through lay and professional stakeholder coproduction using qualitative, quantitative and secondary data. BMJ Open. 7(6). e015413–e015413. 9 indexed citations

Hendry, Maggie, Andrew Booth, Ben Carter, et al.. (2017). Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement. BMC Medicine. 15(1). 155–155. 54 indexed citations

Charles, Joanna M, et al.. (2016). Reducing repeat pregnancies in adolescence: applying realist principles as part of a mixed-methods systematic review to explore what works, for whom, how and under what circumstances. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 16(1). 271–271. 20 indexed citations

Whitaker, Rhiannon, Maggie Hendry, Andrew Booth, et al.. (2016). Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement. Health Technology Assessment. 20(16). 1–214. 44 indexed citations

Whitaker, Rhiannon, Maggie Hendry, Andrew Booth, et al.. (2016). Mixed-methods appraisal tool. 11 indexed citations

Hendry, Maggie, Ben Carter, Jane Noyes, et al.. (2015). Interventions for preventing unintended repeat pregnancies among adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 9 indexed citations

Charles, Joanna M, et al.. (2015). An embedded realist review of what works, for whom, how, and in what circumstances to reduce repeat pregnancies in adolescence: a systematic mixed-methods review. The Lancet. 386. S28–S28. 1 indexed citations

Hendry, Maggie, Andrew Booth, Joanna M Charles, et al.. (2014). Intervention Now To Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement. BMJ Open. 4(4). e004733–e004733. 18 indexed citations

Neal, Richard D, Sadia Nafees, Diana Pasterfield, et al.. (2014). Patient-reported measurement of time to diagnosis in cancer: development of the Cancer Symptom Interval Measure (C-SIM) and randomised controlled trial of method of delivery. BMC Health Services Research. 14(1). 3–3. 33 indexed citations

10.

Hendry, Maggie, Diana Pasterfield, Ruth Lewis, et al.. (2012). Are women ready for the new cervical screening protocol in England? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of views about human papillomavirus testing. British Journal of Cancer. 107(2). 243–254. 38 indexed citations

11.

Hendry, Maggie, et al.. (2012). Why do we want the right to die? A systematic review of the international literature on the views of patients, carers and the public on assisted dying. Palliative Medicine. 27(1). 13–26. 114 indexed citations

12.

Neal, Richard D, Nigel Bruce, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, et al.. (2011). Enhancing ventilation in homes of children with asthma: pragmatic randomised controlled trial. British Journal of General Practice. 61(592). e724–e732. 22 indexed citations

13.

Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor, Richard D Neal, Pat Linck, et al.. (2011). Enhancing ventilation in homes of children with asthma: cost-effectiveness study alongside randomised controlled trial. British Journal of General Practice. 61(592). e733–e741. 31 indexed citations

14.

Neal, Richard D, et al.. (2008). Determining patient and primary care delay in the diagnosis of cancer – lessons from a pilot study of patients referred for suspected cancer. BMC Family Practice. 9(1). 9–9. 20 indexed citations

15.

Pasterfield, Diana, et al.. (2006). GPs' views on changing the law on physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia, and willingness to prescribe or inject lethal drugs: a survey from Wales.. PubMed. 56(527). 450–2. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact