Diana M. Mitchell

2.9k total citations
30 papers, 581 citations indexed

About

Diana M. Mitchell is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana M. Mitchell has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 581 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Molecular Biology, 12 papers in Cell Biology and 11 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Diana M. Mitchell's work include Retinal Development and Disorders (13 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (11 papers) and Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (9 papers). Diana M. Mitchell is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Development and Disorders (13 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (11 papers) and Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (9 papers). Diana M. Mitchell collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Germany. Diana M. Mitchell's co-authors include Deborah L. Stenkamp, Matthew A. Williams, Eugene V. Ravkov, Samuel S. Hunter, Ruth A. Frey, Shoji Kawamura, Daniel D. New, Chi Sun, Quang Ngoc Nguyen and Yana Puckett and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and The Journal of Cell Biology.

In The Last Decade

Diana M. Mitchell

29 papers receiving 576 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Diana M. Mitchell United States 12 293 162 155 146 76 30 581
Piotr Stawiński Poland 15 514 1.8× 76 0.5× 59 0.4× 48 0.3× 77 1.0× 58 782
Celia E. Shiau United States 11 285 1.0× 185 1.1× 214 1.4× 128 0.9× 82 1.1× 17 583
Denis Barritault France 10 496 1.7× 113 0.7× 29 0.2× 48 0.3× 62 0.8× 20 685
Catarina M. Henriques United Kingdom 11 195 0.7× 88 0.5× 122 0.8× 26 0.2× 22 0.3× 16 508
D.J. Sidjanin United States 14 514 1.8× 105 0.6× 27 0.2× 30 0.2× 62 0.8× 35 724
Yasushi Isashiki Japan 17 474 1.6× 33 0.2× 218 1.4× 42 0.3× 92 1.2× 48 933
Marcia Lewis United States 11 205 0.7× 49 0.3× 53 0.3× 19 0.1× 34 0.4× 18 491
Ricardo Romero Spain 6 252 0.9× 22 0.1× 62 0.4× 64 0.4× 77 1.0× 6 497
Anja Schlecht Germany 16 279 1.0× 21 0.1× 175 1.1× 235 1.6× 46 0.6× 37 885
Rodrigo A. Morales Chile 16 209 0.7× 94 0.6× 261 1.7× 37 0.3× 46 0.6× 24 562

Countries citing papers authored by Diana M. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana M. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana M. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana M. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana M. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana M. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana M. Mitchell. The network helps show where Diana M. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana M. Mitchell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana M. Mitchell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana M. Mitchell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana M. Mitchell. Diana M. Mitchell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mitchell, Diana M., et al.. (2024). Forced MyD88 signaling in microglia impacts the production and survival of regenerated retinal neurons. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 12. 1495586–1495586. 1 indexed citations
2.
Mitchell, Diana M., et al.. (2024). Securin regulates the spatiotemporal dynamics of separase. The Journal of Cell Biology. 224(2). 2 indexed citations
4.
Mitchell, Diana M., et al.. (2023). PCNA Staining of Retinal Cryosections to Assess Microglial/Macrophage Proliferation. Methods in molecular biology. 2636. 389–400. 2 indexed citations
5.
Stenkamp, Deborah L., et al.. (2021). Evidence of regional specializations in regenerated zebrafish retina. Experimental Eye Research. 212. 108789–108789. 6 indexed citations
6.
Cook, Elizabeth, et al.. (2020). Obesity Is Not an Independent Predictor of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection Outcomes. Surgical Infections. 22(2). 187–192. 4 indexed citations
7.
Mitchell, Diana M., et al.. (2020). Bioinformatic analysis and functional predictions of selected regeneration-associated transcripts expressed by zebrafish microglia. BMC Genomics. 21(1). 870–870. 5 indexed citations
8.
Bai, Xiaofei, Chin‐Yi Chen, Wencheng Wang, et al.. (2019). Aurora B functions at the apical surface after specialized cytokinesis during morphogenesis in C. elegans. Development. 147(1). 20 indexed citations
9.
Frey, Ruth A., et al.. (2019). Endocrine regulation of multichromatic color vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116(34). 16882–16891. 47 indexed citations
10.
Mitchell, Diana M., et al.. (2019). Rewiring the Regenerated Zebrafish Retina: Reemergence of Bipolar Neurons and Cone-Bipolar Circuitry Following an Inner Retinal Lesion. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 7. 95–95. 16 indexed citations
11.
Mitchell, Diana M., Yana Puckett, & Quang Ngoc Nguyen. (2019). Literature Review of Current Management of Colorectal Liver Metastasis. Cureus. 11(1). e3940–e3940. 29 indexed citations
12.
Puckett, Yana, et al.. (2019). Laparoscopic colectomies associated with decreased retrieval of 12 or more lymph nodes compared to open in elective colon cancer surgery. ecancermedicalscience. 13. 968–968. 2 indexed citations
13.
Mitchell, Diana M., et al.. (2018). Dynamic changes in microglial and macrophage characteristics during degeneration and regeneration of the zebrafish retina. Journal of Neuroinflammation. 15(1). 163–163. 81 indexed citations
14.
Mitchell, Diana M., et al.. (2017). Restoration of Dendritic Complexity, Functional Connectivity, and Diversity of Regenerated Retinal Bipolar Neurons in Adult Zebrafish. Journal of Neuroscience. 38(1). 120–136. 30 indexed citations
15.
Dissanaike, Sharmila, et al.. (2017). Socioeconomic status, gender, and burn injury: A retrospective review. The American Journal of Surgery. 214(4). 677–681. 23 indexed citations
16.
Mitchell, Diana M., Craig B. Stevens, Ruth A. Frey, et al.. (2015). Retinoic Acid Signaling Regulates Differential Expression of the Tandemly-Duplicated Long Wavelength-Sensitive Cone Opsin Genes in Zebrafish. PLoS Genetics. 11(8). e1005483–e1005483. 47 indexed citations
17.
Mitchell, Diana M., et al.. (2013). Bim Mediates the Elimination of Functionally Unfit Th1 Responders from the Memory Pool. PLoS ONE. 8(6). e67363–e67363. 8 indexed citations
18.
Mitchell, Diana M. & Matthew A. Williams. (2010). An Activation Marker Finds a Function. Immunity. 32(1). 9–11. 12 indexed citations
19.
Mitchell, Diana M., Eugene V. Ravkov, & Matthew A. Williams. (2010). Distinct Roles for IL-2 and IL-15 in the Differentiation and Survival of CD8+ Effector and Memory T Cells. The Journal of Immunology. 184(12). 6719–6730. 102 indexed citations
20.
Mitchell, Diana M., et al.. (2003). Hyperparathyroid crisis in a pediatric patient. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 68(2). 237–241. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026