Diana L. Gray

1.8k total citations
39 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Diana L. Gray is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana L. Gray has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 10 papers in Surgery and 10 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Diana L. Gray's work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (19 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (9 papers) and Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (7 papers). Diana L. Gray is often cited by papers focused on Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (19 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (9 papers) and Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (7 papers). Diana L. Gray collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and India. Diana L. Gray's co-authors include James P. Crane, Anthony Odibo, Jane E. Corteville, Jeffrey M. Dicke, Jennifer G. Duncan, Lisa Hayibor, Ann Marie Dale, Thomas Kannampallil, Emily Page and Jaime R. Strickland and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Diana L. Gray

37 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Diana L. Gray
Beverley Botting United Kingdom
L. Geerts South Africa
Mireille N. Bekker Netherlands
Terry D. Allen United States
T. Yee Khong Australia
Adam Borgida United States
J. M. M. van Lith Netherlands
Beverley Botting United Kingdom
Diana L. Gray
Citations per year, relative to Diana L. Gray Diana L. Gray (= 1×) peers Beverley Botting

Countries citing papers authored by Diana L. Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana L. Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana L. Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana L. Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana L. Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana L. Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana L. Gray. The network helps show where Diana L. Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana L. Gray

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana L. Gray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana L. Gray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana L. Gray. Diana L. Gray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dicke, Jeffrey M., et al.. (2021). 753 Umbilical artery doppler improvement after steroid administration is associated with improved fetal growth. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 224(2). S471–S472.
2.
Evanoff, Bradley, Jaime R. Strickland, Ann Marie Dale, et al.. (2020). Work-Related and Personal Factors Associated With Mental Well-Being During the COVID-19 Response: Survey of Health Care and Other Workers. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(8). e21366–e21366. 204 indexed citations
3.
Verma, Amanda, Diana L. Gray, Jeannie C. Kelly, et al.. (2019). AORTOPATHY AND PREGNANCY: IT TAKES A VILLAGE. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 73(9). 2527–2527. 1 indexed citations
4.
Cooper, Amber R., Kathleen O’Neill, Jenifer E. Allsworth, et al.. (2011). Smaller fetal size in singletons after infertility therapies: the influence of technology and the underlying infertility. Fertility and Sterility. 96(5). 1100–1106. 43 indexed citations
5.
Goetzinger, Katherine, Jeffrey M. Dicke, Diana L. Gray, et al.. (2010). The effect of fetal gender in predicting Down syndrome using long bone ultrasonographic measurements. Prenatal Diagnosis. 30(10). 950–955. 5 indexed citations
6.
Harper, Lorie M., Diana L. Gray, Jeffrey M. Dicke, et al.. (2010). Do Race-Specific Definitions of Short Long Bones Improve the Detection of Down Syndrome on Second-Trimester Genetic Sonograms?. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 29(2). 231–235. 13 indexed citations
7.
Goetzinger, Katherine, et al.. (2010). Predicting the risk of pre‐eclampsia between 11 and 13 weeks' gestation by combining maternal characteristics and serum analytes, PAPP‐A and free β‐hCG. Prenatal Diagnosis. 30(12-13). 1138–1142. 67 indexed citations
8.
Goetzinger, Katherine, et al.. (2009). The efficiency of first-trimester serum analytes and maternal characteristics in predicting fetal growth disorders. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 201(4). 412.e1–412.e6. 46 indexed citations
9.
Stamilio, David M., et al.. (2009). Predicting adverse neonatal outcomes in fetuses with abdominal wall defects using prenatal risk factors. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 201(4). 383.e1–383.e6. 45 indexed citations
10.
Shanks, Anthony, Anthony Odibo, & Diana L. Gray. (2009). Echogenic Intracardiac Foci. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 28(12). 1639–1643. 17 indexed citations
11.
Gray, Diana L., et al.. (2009). Reevaluating Humeral Length for the Detection of Fetal Trisomy 21. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 28(10). 1325–1330. 8 indexed citations
12.
Tuuli, Methodius G., Jeffrey M. Dicke, David M. Stamilio, et al.. (2009). Prevalence and likelihood ratios for aneuploidy in fetuses diagnosed prenatally with isolated congenital cardiac defects. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 201(4). 390.e1–390.e5. 14 indexed citations
13.
Odibo, Anthony, Jeffrey M. Dicke, Diana L. Gray, et al.. (2008). Evaluating the Rate and Risk Factors for Fetal Loss After Chorionic Villus Sampling. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 112(4). 813–819. 49 indexed citations
14.
Gupta, Amod, Peter S. Carlton, Diana L. Gray, et al.. (2001). Effects of Dietary N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)retinamide on N-Nitrosomethylbenzylamine Metabolism and Esophageal Tumorigenesis in the Fischer 344 Rat. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 93(13). 990–998. 10 indexed citations
15.
Langer, Jacob C., Hero K. Hussain, Azra Khan, et al.. (2001). Prenatal diagnosis of esophageal atresia using sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 36(5). 804–807. 57 indexed citations
16.
Holcomb, William L., et al.. (2000). Abdominal circumference vs. estimated weight to predict large for gestational age birth weight in diabetic pregnancy. Clinical Imaging. 24(1). 1–7. 17 indexed citations
17.
Gray, Diana L., et al.. (1996). Field evaluation of pregnancy diagnosis using bovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein (bPAG). Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège). 16 indexed citations
18.
Gray, Diana L., et al.. (1996). IS GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS WARRANTED WHEN ISOLATED CHOROID PLEXUS CYSTS ARE FOUND?. Prenatal Diagnosis. 16(11). 983–990. 28 indexed citations
19.
Corteville, Jane E., Diana L. Gray, & James P. Crane. (1991). Congenital hydronephrosis: Correlation of fetal ultrasonographic findings with infant outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 165(2). 384–388. 164 indexed citations
20.
Gray, Diana L. & James P. Crane. (1988). Prenatal diagnosis of urinary tract malformation. Pediatric Nephrology. 2(3). 326–333. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026