Diana Hulse‐Killacky

579 total citations
28 papers, 400 citations indexed

About

Diana Hulse‐Killacky is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana Hulse‐Killacky has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 400 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Social Psychology, 13 papers in Clinical Psychology and 6 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Diana Hulse‐Killacky's work include Counseling Practices and Supervision (10 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (8 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (7 papers). Diana Hulse‐Killacky is often cited by papers focused on Counseling Practices and Supervision (10 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (8 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (7 papers). Diana Hulse‐Killacky collaborates with scholars based in United States. Diana Hulse‐Killacky's co-authors include Delini M. Fernando, Betsy J. Page, D. Keith Morran, Louis V. Paradise, Angela Alexander, Janice L. DeLucia‐Waack, Jennifer Sue Kleiner, Robert K. Conyne and Ann Vernon and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Counseling & Development, Counselor Education and Supervision and Community College Journal of Research and Practice.

In The Last Decade

Diana Hulse‐Killacky

27 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Diana Hulse‐Killacky United States 11 228 211 78 58 42 28 400
Harriet L. Glosoff United States 11 220 1.0× 314 1.5× 53 0.7× 50 0.9× 70 1.7× 21 387
Dennis W. Engels United States 10 111 0.5× 172 0.8× 82 1.1× 25 0.4× 39 0.9× 37 331
Ken Norem United States 11 155 0.7× 260 1.2× 73 0.9× 50 0.9× 44 1.0× 23 337
John M. Littrell United States 11 304 1.3× 213 1.0× 61 0.8× 109 1.9× 22 0.5× 33 451
Laura E. Welfare United States 15 307 1.3× 383 1.8× 66 0.8× 71 1.2× 73 1.7× 37 522
David G. Zimpfer United States 11 173 0.8× 199 0.9× 36 0.5× 34 0.6× 36 0.9× 48 339
Donald L. Bubenzer United States 12 190 0.8× 179 0.8× 30 0.4× 33 0.6× 40 1.0× 32 318
John R. Culbreth United States 10 244 1.1× 342 1.6× 49 0.6× 89 1.5× 86 2.0× 25 426
Courtland C. Lee United States 10 155 0.7× 254 1.2× 132 1.7× 50 0.9× 36 0.9× 27 396
Jane E. Atieno Okech United States 12 162 0.7× 247 1.2× 55 0.7× 34 0.6× 54 1.3× 27 328

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Hulse‐Killacky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Hulse‐Killacky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Hulse‐Killacky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Hulse‐Killacky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Hulse‐Killacky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Hulse‐Killacky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Hulse‐Killacky. The network helps show where Diana Hulse‐Killacky may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Hulse‐Killacky

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Hulse‐Killacky. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Hulse‐Killacky based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Hulse‐Killacky. Diana Hulse‐Killacky is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vernon, Ann, et al.. (2013). Critical Incidents in Group Counseling. DigitalCommons - Fairfield (Fairfield University). 3 indexed citations
2.
Hulse‐Killacky, Diana, et al.. (2012). Interpersonal Skills Training in Police Academy Curriculum. DigitalCommons - Fairfield (Fairfield University). 81(2). 4 indexed citations
3.
Hulse‐Killacky, Diana, et al.. (2012). Corrective feedback in police work. DigitalCommons - Fairfield (Fairfield University). 81(6). 1 indexed citations
4.
Hulse‐Killacky, Diana, et al.. (2008). A Model for Collaborative Teaching Teams in Counselor Education. Counselor Education and Supervision. 47(3). 146–163. 20 indexed citations
5.
Hulse‐Killacky, Diana, et al.. (2006). Using Voice, Meaning, Mutual Construction of Knowledge, and Transfer of Learning to Apply an Ecological Perspective to Group Work Training. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work. 31(3). 189–200. 13 indexed citations
6.
Hulse‐Killacky, Diana, et al.. (2006). Facilitating Reminiscence Groups: Perceptions of Group Leaders. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work. 31(1). 73–88. 2 indexed citations
7.
Fernando, Delini M. & Diana Hulse‐Killacky. (2006). Getting to the Point: Using Research Meetings and the Inverted Triangle Visual to Develop a Dissertation Research Question. Counselor Education and Supervision. 46(2). 103–115. 7 indexed citations
8.
Hulse‐Killacky, Diana, et al.. (2005). An Effective Research Team Method to Influence Research and Scholarly Development. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work. 30(3). 241–252. 4 indexed citations
9.
Fernando, Delini M. & Diana Hulse‐Killacky. (2005). The Relationship of Supervisory Styles to Satisfaction With Supervision and the Perceived Self‐Efficacy of Master's‐Level Counseling Students. Counselor Education and Supervision. 44(4). 293–304. 69 indexed citations
10.
Alexander, Angela & Diana Hulse‐Killacky. (2005). Childhood Memories and Receptivity to Corrective Feedback in Group Supervision: Implications for Group Work. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work. 30(1). 23–45. 10 indexed citations
11.
Hulse‐Killacky, Diana, et al.. (2004). Group Work Is Not Just for the Group Class Anymore: Teaching Generic Group Competency Skills Across the Counselor Education Curriculum. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work. 29(1). 87–96. 9 indexed citations
12.
DeLucia‐Waack, Janice L., et al.. (2002). Group work experts share their favorite activities: A guide to choosing, planning, conducting, and processing -revised ed.. DigitalCommons - Fairfield (Fairfield University). 7 indexed citations
13.
Hulse‐Killacky, Diana, et al.. (2000). Making Task Groups Work in Your World. 15 indexed citations
14.
Hulse‐Killacky, Diana, et al.. (1999). Critical Incidents in Group Therapy - 2nd ed.. DigitalCommons - Fairfield (Fairfield University). 6 indexed citations
15.
Hulse‐Killacky, Diana, et al.. (1996). Balancing process and content in groups: A metaphor. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work. 21(2). 90–93. 7 indexed citations
16.
Hulse‐Killacky, Diana & Betsy J. Page. (1994). Development of the corrective feedback instrument: A tool for use in counselor training groups. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work. 19(4). 197–210. 21 indexed citations
17.
Hulse‐Killacky, Diana. (1993). Group work as a developmental context: An interview with richard L. Hayes. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work. 18(1). 3–10. 5 indexed citations
18.
Hulse‐Killacky, Diana, et al.. (1991). Reporting group research: Conceptual and technical considerations for preparing manuscripts. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work. 16(2). 101–108. 3 indexed citations
19.
Morran, D. Keith, et al.. (1989). Single-subject research designs for group counselors studying their own groups. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work. 14(2). 93–97. 12 indexed citations
20.
Hulse‐Killacky, Diana, et al.. (1986). Critical incidents in group therapy. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026