Diana E. Wolf
Impact in
-
- Plant and animal studies
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Plant Reproductive Biology 6
-
- Plant and animal studies 9
- Co-authors
- Naoki Takebayashi (9 shared papers)Loren H. Rieseberg (6 shared papers)Lynda F. Delph (2 shared papers)Allison A. Snow (2 shared papers)M. J. Paulsen (1 shared paper)Michael Reagon (1 shared paper)Sarena M. Selbo (1 shared paper)Diana Pilson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Heredity (3 papers)American Journal of Botany (3 papers)The Journal of Cell Biology (1 paper)The American Naturalist (1 paper)Theoretical and Applied Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexicoGermany
In The Last Decade
Diana E. Wolf
20 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 529
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 310
- Plant Science 732
- Genetics 445
- Ecological Modeling 34
Countries citing papers authored by Diana E. Wolf
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana E. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana E. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana E. Wolf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana E. Wolf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana E. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana E. Wolf. The network helps show where Diana E. Wolf may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diana E. Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 417 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 204 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 121 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 118 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 91 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 64 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 48 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 43 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 34 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 33 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1992 | 2 |
About Diana E. Wolf
Diana E. Wolf is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Genetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (9 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (6 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (2 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (2 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (2 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (529 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (310 citations), Plant Science (732 citations), Genetics (445 citations) and Ecological Modeling (34 citations). Diana E. Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Naoki Takebayashi, Loren H. Rieseberg, Lynda F. Delph, Allison A. Snow, M. J. Paulsen, Michael Reagon, Sarena M. Selbo, Diana Pilson, Dulce M. Arias and Jeannette Whitton. Their work appears in journals such as Heredity, American Journal of Botany, The Journal of Cell Biology, The American Naturalist and Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.