Diana E. Post

442 total citations
9 papers, 353 citations indexed

About

Diana E. Post is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Pharmacology and Occupational Therapy. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana E. Post has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 353 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine, 4 papers in Pharmacology and 1 paper in Occupational Therapy. Recurrent topics in Diana E. Post's work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (2 papers). Diana E. Post is often cited by papers focused on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (2 papers). Diana E. Post collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Israel. Diana E. Post's co-authors include Andrea Hrbek, David M. Eisenberg, Julie E. Buring, Maureen T. Connelly, Daniel C. Cherkin, Roger B. Davis, Anna Legedza, Ted J. Kaptchuk, Samuel S. Myers and Russell S. Phillips and has published in prestigious journals such as Spine, Journal of General Internal Medicine and Academic Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Diana E. Post

8 papers receiving 338 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Diana E. Post United States	7	171	140	91	55	49	9	353
Andreas Eklund Sweden	11	246 1.4×	42 0.3×	75 0.8×	66 1.2×	96 2.0×	27	319
Alison Trewhela United Kingdom	6	237 1.4×	108 0.8×	40 0.4×	61 1.1×	38 0.8×	6	348
David P. Russo United States	6	211 1.2×	68 0.5×	97 1.1×	79 1.4×	72 1.5×	9	324
Carol Fawkes United Kingdom	10	155 0.9×	79 0.6×	46 0.5×	45 0.8×	16 0.3×	22	255
Paul Orrock Australia	11	191 1.1×	109 0.8×	48 0.5×	63 1.1×	26 0.5×	23	370
Annika Rosenbaum Denmark	10	309 1.8×	37 0.3×	63 0.7×	87 1.6×	162 3.3×	10	386
Rachel Goldgrub Canada	8	319 1.9×	39 0.3×	53 0.6×	58 1.1×	129 2.6×	12	419
Richard Branson United States	5	220 1.3×	57 0.4×	46 0.5×	37 0.7×	96 2.0×	8	310
Clark D. Danielson United States	6	207 1.2×	118 0.8×	46 0.5×	51 0.9×	72 1.5×	10	391
Aram S. Mardian United States	7	173 1.0×	37 0.3×	50 0.5×	45 0.8×	48 1.0×	17	272

Countries citing papers authored by Diana E. Post

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana E. Post's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana E. Post with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana E. Post more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana E. Post

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana E. Post. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana E. Post. The network helps show where Diana E. Post may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana E. Post

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana E. Post. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana E. Post based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana E. Post. Diana E. Post is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Eisenberg, David M., Ted J. Kaptchuk, Diana E. Post, et al.. (2016). Establishing an Integrative Medicine Program Within an Academic Health Center: Essential Considerations. Academic Medicine. 91(9). 1223–1230. 42 indexed citations

Eisenberg, David M., Julie E. Buring, Andrea Hrbek, et al.. (2012). A Model of Integrative Care for Low-Back Pain. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 18(4). 354–362. 39 indexed citations

Eisenberg, David M., J. E. Buring, Andrea Hrbek, et al.. (2012). OA11.02. A model of integrative care for low back pain. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 12(S1). 4 indexed citations

Post, Diana E., et al.. (2010). Golf at a Crossroads: Hazardous or Healthy Strategies. Outlooks on Pest Management. 21(3). 113–121. 1 indexed citations

Chibnik, Lori B., et al.. (2009). A controlled comparison of brachial artery flow mediated dilation (FMD) and digital pulse amplitude tonometry (PAT) in the assessment of endothelial function in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 18(3). 235–242. 33 indexed citations

Eisenberg, David M., Diana E. Post, Roger B. Davis, et al.. (2007). Addition of Choice of Complementary Therapies to Usual Care for Acute Low Back Pain. Spine. 32(2). 151–158. 71 indexed citations

Myers, Samuel S., Russell S. Phillips, Roger B. Davis, et al.. (2007). Patient Expectations as Predictors of Outcome In Patients with Acute Low Back Pain. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 23(2). 148–153. 139 indexed citations

Post, Diana E.. (2000). Adoption in Clinical Psychology: A Review of the Absence, Ramifications, and Recommendations for Change. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless. 9(4). 361–372. 10 indexed citations

Gubbels, Jessica S., et al.. (1986). Acute low back pain: patients' perceptions of pain four weeks after initial diagnosis and treatment in general practice. Clinical Biomechanics. 1(4). 236–237. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact