Diana Carney

2.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
11 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Diana Carney is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana Carney has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 3 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 2 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. Recurrent topics in Diana Carney's work include Agriculture and Rural Development Research (3 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (2 papers) and Agricultural Innovations and Practices (2 papers). Diana Carney is often cited by papers focused on Agriculture and Rural Development Research (3 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (2 papers) and Agricultural Innovations and Practices (2 papers). Diana Carney collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Africa. Diana Carney's co-authors include C. Ashley, John D. Farrington, C. J. van Rooyen and Jim Bingen and has published in prestigious journals such as Food Policy, Journal of International Development and Agrekon.

In The Last Decade

Diana Carney

11 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Sustainable rural livelihoods : what contribution can we ... 1998 2026 2007 2016 1998 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Diana Carney United Kingdom 8 493 470 324 272 223 11 1.5k
William G. Moseley United States 21 547 1.1× 329 0.7× 242 0.7× 191 0.7× 263 1.2× 133 2.4k
Leslie Gray United States 21 359 0.7× 273 0.6× 330 1.0× 301 1.1× 112 0.5× 34 1.5k
Leah K. VanWey United States 22 351 0.7× 698 1.5× 688 2.1× 252 0.9× 241 1.1× 38 1.9k
P.G.M. Hebinck Netherlands 22 611 1.2× 251 0.5× 442 1.4× 191 0.7× 149 0.7× 84 1.6k
James F. Keeley Canada 12 670 1.4× 388 0.8× 282 0.9× 475 1.7× 139 0.6× 50 1.6k
Kojo Amanor Ghana 21 686 1.4× 277 0.6× 260 0.8× 501 1.8× 139 0.6× 48 1.5k
Esther Mwangi United States 18 466 0.9× 275 0.6× 657 2.0× 373 1.4× 217 1.0× 36 1.5k
Jon D. Unruh Canada 21 554 1.1× 439 0.9× 597 1.8× 709 2.6× 134 0.6× 89 1.7k
Annelies Zoomers Netherlands 21 928 1.9× 886 1.9× 526 1.6× 547 2.0× 223 1.0× 96 2.5k
Steve Wiggins United Kingdom 19 951 1.9× 267 0.6× 166 0.5× 473 1.7× 429 1.9× 84 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Carney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Carney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Carney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Carney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Carney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Carney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Carney. The network helps show where Diana Carney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Carney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Carney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Carney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Carney. Diana Carney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Carney, Diana. (2009). Formal Farmers' Organisations in the Agricultural Technology System: Current Roles and Future Challenges. Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University). 7 indexed citations
2.
Carney, Diana & John D. Farrington. (2005). Natural Resource Management and Institutional Change. 33 indexed citations
3.
Ashley, C. & Diana Carney. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods: lessons from early experience.. 462 indexed citations
4.
Carney, Diana, et al.. (1999). Competitive Agricultural Technology Funds in Developing Countries. Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University). 11 indexed citations
5.
Carney, Diana. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: what contribution can we make? Papers presented at the Department for International Development's Natural Resources Advisers' Conference, July 1998.. 252 indexed citations
6.
Carney, Diana. (1998). The White Paper's treatment of agriculture, natural resources and rural livelihoods. Journal of International Development. 10(2). 269–276. 4 indexed citations
7.
Carney, Diana. (1998). Changing public and private roles in agricultural service provision. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 41 indexed citations
8.
9.
Bingen, Jim, et al.. (1997). The Malian union of cotton and food crop producers: its current and potential role in technology development and transfer.. 5 indexed citations
10.
Carney, Diana & C. J. van Rooyen. (1996). EMPOWERING SMALL FARMERS THROUGH COLLECTIVE ACTION: THE CASE OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSFER. Agrekon. 35(4). 332–335. 4 indexed citations
11.
Carney, Diana. (1995). The changing public role in services to agriculture: a framework for analysis. Food Policy. 20(6). 521–528. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026