Diana C. Roe

50 total papers · 1.2k total citations
18 papers, 766 citations indexed

About

Diana C. Roe is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computer Networks and Communications and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana C. Roe has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 766 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Computer Networks and Communications and 4 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Diana C. Roe's work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (3 papers) and Cloud Computing and Resource Management (3 papers). Diana C. Roe is often cited by papers focused on Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (3 papers) and Cloud Computing and Resource Management (3 papers). Diana C. Roe collaborates with scholars based in United States. Diana C. Roe's co-authors include Jean‐Loup Faulon, Shawn Martin, Irwin D. Kuntz, Philippe Pébaÿ, David Thompson, Todd Ewing, Ellen K. Kick, Guangcheng Liu, Jonathan A. Ellman and Yaxiong Sun and has published in prestigious journals such as Bioinformatics, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Diana C. Roe

17 papers receiving 728 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Diana C. Roe 555 262 107 67 52 18 766
Tommi Nyrönen 420 0.8× 140 0.5× 73 0.7× 19 0.3× 38 0.7× 36 812
Yanli Wang 373 0.7× 455 1.7× 91 0.9× 74 1.1× 99 1.9× 36 879
Antonio de la Vega de León 219 0.4× 176 0.7× 141 1.3× 96 1.4× 81 1.6× 44 752
Otto Ritter 549 1.0× 106 0.4× 44 0.4× 25 0.4× 88 1.7× 7 745
James Chapman 201 0.4× 131 0.5× 100 0.9× 37 0.6× 113 2.2× 42 688
Alan H. Lipkus 260 0.5× 218 0.8× 247 2.3× 21 0.3× 78 1.5× 16 738
Wendy A. Warr 430 0.8× 460 1.8× 141 1.3× 15 0.2× 155 3.0× 48 890
Dana Movshovitz‐Attias 518 0.9× 131 0.5× 42 0.4× 33 0.5× 52 1.0× 12 865
V. Srinivasa Rao 403 0.7× 86 0.3× 16 0.1× 66 1.0× 25 0.5× 32 764
Xiaolong Wu 245 0.4× 232 0.9× 41 0.4× 55 0.8× 170 3.3× 39 698

Countries citing papers authored by Diana C. Roe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana C. Roe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana C. Roe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana C. Roe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana C. Roe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana C. Roe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana C. Roe. The network helps show where Diana C. Roe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana C. Roe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana C. Roe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana C. Roe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana C. Roe. Diana C. Roe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026