Dennis P. Schaap

710 total citations
7 papers, 159 citations indexed

About

Dennis P. Schaap is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Dennis P. Schaap has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 159 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in Oncology and 1 paper in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Dennis P. Schaap's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (6 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (5 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers). Dennis P. Schaap is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (6 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (5 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers). Dennis P. Schaap collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and India. Dennis P. Schaap's co-authors include H.J.T. Rutten, Miranda Kusters, Joost Nederend, Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen, Jeltsje S. Cnossen, Ineke van Lijnschoten, Sanne M. B. I. Botden, Bas H. Verhoeven, Richard Goossens and Jack J. Jakimowicz and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, British journal of surgery and Annals of Surgical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Dennis P. Schaap

7 papers receiving 159 citations

Peers

Dennis P. Schaap

ONCOL

SURGE

RNMI

PRM

BE

Heena Bidd United Kingdom

Lakshmi Ramanathan United States

Rosa Angela Filiberti Italy

J.H.B. Boomsma Netherlands

Bahar Saberzadeh-Ardestani United States

Francesco Belia Italy

Annabel Sharkey United Kingdom

Patrizia Marsanic Italy

Dong Woon Lee South Korea

Senthurun Mylvaganam United Kingdom

Heena Bidd United Kingdom

Dennis P. Schaap

42 ×0.4

ONCOL

78 ×0.9

SURGE

5 ×0.1

RNMI

26 ×0.9

PRM

5 ×0.2

BE

Citations per year, relative to Dennis P. Schaap Dennis P. Schaap (= 1×) peers Heena Bidd

Countries citing papers authored by Dennis P. Schaap

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis P. Schaap's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis P. Schaap with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis P. Schaap more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dennis P. Schaap

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis P. Schaap. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis P. Schaap. The network helps show where Dennis P. Schaap may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dennis P. Schaap

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dennis P. Schaap. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dennis P. Schaap based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dennis P. Schaap. Dennis P. Schaap is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Schaap, Dennis P., Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen, Johanne G. Bloemen, et al.. (2021). Improved response rate in patients with prognostically poor locally advanced rectal cancer after treatment with induction chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy when compared with chemoradiotherapy alone: A matched case-control study. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 47(9). 2429–2435. 10 indexed citations

2.

Schaap, Dennis P., Jacobus W. A. Burger, Jeltsje S. Cnossen, et al.. (2021). Prognostic Implications of MRI-Detected EMVI and Tumor Deposits and Their Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in cT3 and cT4 Rectal Cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 111(3). 816–825. 24 indexed citations

3.

Deken, Marion M., Willemieke S. Tummers, Shadhvi S. Bhairosingh, et al.. (2021). CEA, EpCAM, αvβ6 and uPAR Expression in Rectal Cancer Patients with a Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Therapy. Diagnostics. 11(3). 516–516. 9 indexed citations

4.

Valk, Kim S. de, Marion M. Deken, Dennis P. Schaap, et al.. (2020). Dose-Finding Study of a CEA-Targeting Agent, SGM-101, for Intraoperative Fluorescence Imaging of Colorectal Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 28(3). 1832–1844. 47 indexed citations

5.

Kroon, Hidde M., Dennis P. Schaap, Sergei Bedrikovetski, et al.. (2019). Lateral Lymph Node Metastases in Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancers May Not Be Treated Effectively With Neoadjuvant (Chemo)Radiotherapy Only. Frontiers in Oncology. 9. 1355–1355. 15 indexed citations

6.

Schaap, Dennis P., Atsushi Ogura, Joost Nederend, et al.. (2018). Prognostic implications of MRI-detected lateral nodal disease and extramural vascular invasion in rectal cancer. British journal of surgery. 105(13). 1844–1852. 30 indexed citations

7.

Botden, Sanne M. B. I., et al.. (2017). “Reflection- Before -Practice” Improves Self-Assessment and End-Performance in Laparoscopic Surgical Skills Training. Journal of surgical education. 75(2). 527–533. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact